Vi and Vim Asked on August 31, 2021
I’ve noticed in bash/shell it highlights $(...)
in red, for example:
However, if I change the syntax from ft=sh
to ft=bash
, it does not do this:
What’s the reason for this? Am I doing something wrong with the ft=sh
, or why is that highlighted in red when it’s a legitimate syntax construct?
This is because the original Bourne shell only understands `...`
- the standard $( ... )
syntax was added later. From syntax/sh.vim
:
" $() and $(()): {{{1
" $(..) is not supported by sh (Bourne shell). However, apparently
" some systems (HP?) have as their /bin/sh a (link to) Korn shell
" (ie. Posix compliant shell). /bin/ksh should work for those
" systems too, however, so the following syntax will flag $(..) as
" an Error under /bin/sh. By consensus of vimdev'ers!
You can set the variable g:is_bash
to tell the sh
syntax file that sh
is actually bash
, if indeed it is actually bash (does sh --version
show the Bash version?). Or you can set g:is_posix
if sh
is POSIX compliant.
Correct answer by muru on August 31, 2021
Shell originally used only backticks for command substitution:
less `find . -type f`
But these do not nest and suffer from other problems. Bash (and probably ksh, but I’m not up on the history there) used $()
as a newer, improved command substitution.
But that explains the difference and while the filetype matters—in fact, the shebang (#!
line) matters! If you use /bin/sh
, you should only use POSIX sh
features. Otherwise, use the path to a known interpreter and use it’s features.
As pointed out in the comments, POSIX allows the newer command substitution, so it should be safe even in sh
scripts.
Answered by D. Ben Knoble on August 31, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP