TeX - LaTeX Asked on June 29, 2021
Consider the following MWE.
documentclass[a4paper]{scrartcl}
usepackage{fourier}
usepackage{erewhon}
begin{document}
This is my offer.
end{document}
The output looks as follows:
If instead one comments usepackage{erewhon}
, one obtains this other result:
Look at the ff of the word ‘offer’. It’s obvious that they differ. Other than that, though, I haven’t found much difference between using fourier
alone or fourier
with erewhon
(they’re just slightly, very slightly, different). Then, my question is three-fold:
What’s the case for fourier
and the case for fourier
plus erewhon
?
Is this different ff intended or buggy?
If intended, which of the ff is typographically better, if any (and for what reasons)?
PS: the question comes from @egreg’s suggestion in her answer to this question, but I thought that asking this here could be useful to other fourier
potential users.
Thank you all very much in advanced for your time.
Since the question is really old and none of those who commented posted an answer, I'll do it myself. Given the comments to the OP, I would say that the best approach is to use
usepackage[utopia]{newtxmath}
usepackage{erewhon}
This is the font setup I use in most of my documents and I'm very happy with it.
Correct answer by Héctor on June 29, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP