TeX - LaTeX Asked by Layla on October 27, 2020
documentclass[12pt,a4 paper,title page,]{article}
usepackage[a4paper, total={6.5in, 8.5in}]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath}
numberwithin{equation}{section}
usepackage{graphicx}
graphicspath{ {./Images/} }
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{siunitx}
DeclareUnicodeCharacter{2009}{,}
usepackage[export]{adjustbox}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{float}
usepackage{url}
usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
usepackage{cite}
begin{document}
section{Method}
In the first part of the study, I'll discuss the different Hubble constant measurement techniques...cite{Riess2009}.
bibliography{References}
bibliographystyle{unsrt}
end{document}
When I do this it prints
[1] Adam G. Riess et al. A Redetermination of the Hubble Constant with the Hubble Space
Telescope from a Differential Distance Ladder. Astrophys. J., 699:539–563, 2009.
and my reference looks like
@article{Riess2009,
author = "Riess, Adam G. and others",
title = "{A Redetermination of the Hubble Constant with the Hubble Space Telescope from a Differential Distance Ladder}",
eprint = "0905.0695",
archivePrefix = "arXiv",
primaryClass = "astro-ph.CO",
doi = "10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/539",
journal = "Astrophys. J.",
volume = "699",
pages = "539--563",
year = "2009"
}
As you can see
eprint = "0905.0695"
archivePrefix = "arXiv"
primaryClass = "astro-ph.CO"
are missing in the reference. How can I make them appear in the reference. Also Is there way to connect this with a link such that when I click this reference it will directly send me to the https://arxiv.org/abs/0905.0695
Thanks
Before getting to the heart of your question, let me point out that the BibTeX source data you've obtained -- presumably from some online repository -- is a curious mixture of what would be appropriate for an entry of type @article
on the one hand and an entry of type @misc
on the other. To wit, if one goes to https://arxiv.org/abs/0905.0695 and clicks on the "Export citation" link on the right-hand side of the window, one can choose between two entirely different citation data formats. One is the published journal article form, viz.,
@article{Riess_2009,
title={A REDETERMINATION OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT WITH THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE FROM A DIFFERENTIAL DISTANCE LADDER},
volume={699},
ISSN={1538-4357},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/539},
DOI={10.1088/0004-637x/699/1/539},
number={1},
journal={The Astrophysical Journal},
publisher={IOP Publishing},
author={Riess, Adam G. and Macri, Lucas and Casertano, Stefano and Sosey, Megan and Lampeitl, Hubert and Ferguson, Henry C. and Filippenko, Alexei V. and Jha, Saurabh W. and Li, Weidong and Chornock, Ryan and Sarkar, Devdeep},
year={2009},
month={Jun},
pages={539–563}
}
The other is the Arxiv eprint form, viz.,
@misc{riess2009redetermination,
title={A Redetermination of the Hubble Constant with the Hubble Space Telescope from a Differential Distance Ladder},
author={Adam G. Riess and Lucas Macri and Stefano Casertano and Megan Sosey and Hubert Lampeitl and Henry C. Ferguson and Alexei V. Filippenko and Saurabh W. Jha and Weidong Li and Ryan Chornock and Devdeep Sarkar},
year={2009},
eprint={0905.0695},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={astro-ph.CO}
}
I believe you should choose one or the other publication format -- but not a hybrid of the two.
Let's stick with the @article
version but also (a) fix the odd-ball uppercasing of the title
field and (b) truncate the list of authors as per what you showed in your posting:
@article{Riess_2009,
title={{A Redetermination of the Hubble Constant with the
Hubble Space Telescope from a Differential Distance Ladder}},
volume={699},
ISSN={1538-4357},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/539},
DOI={10.1088/0004-637x/699/1/539},
number={1},
journal={The Astrophysical Journal},
publisher={IOP Publishing},
author={Riess, Adam G. and others},
year={2009},
month={Jun},
pages={539-563}
}
Observe that this entry features fields named doi
, url
, and issn
.
Aside: It's important to be aware of the fact that the unsrt
bibliography style has been around in essentially unchanged form since the mid-1980s [!]. Back then, the Internet was but a gleam in the eye of Tim Berners-Lee, and nobody had yet conceived the idea of storing publications in electronic form at (electronic) locations identified by their URLs. Maybe unsurprisingly, then, the unsrt
bibliography style has not been programmed to recognonize fields such as doi
and url
; unrecognized fields are simply ignored.
What to do, then? I suggest you switch from using the cite
citation management package and the unsrt
bibliography style to the natbib
citation management package and the unsrtnat
bibliography style. You should also load the url
(or, better yet, the xurl
) package -- as well as the hyperref
package if you want the URL strings to be clickable hyperlinks.
Observe that the contents of the issn
, doi
, and url
fields are all shown. That's presumably way too much information; you might decide to delete the issn
and doi
fields.
documentclass[12pt,a4paper,titlepage]{article}
usepackage[a4paper, total={6.5in, 8.5in}]{geometry}
begin{filecontents}[overwrite]{References.bib}
@article{Riess_2009,
title={{A Redetermination of the Hubble Constant with the
Hubble Space Telescope from a Differential Distance Ladder}},
volume={699},
ISSN={1538-4357},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/539},
DOI={10.1088/0004-637x/699/1/539},
number={1},
journal={The Astrophysical Journal},
publisher={IOP Publishing},
author={Riess, Adam G. and others},
year={2009},
month={Jun},
pages={539-563}
}
end{filecontents}
usepackage[numbers]{natbib}
bibliographystyle{unsrtnat}
usepackage{xurl}
usepackage[colorlinks,allcolors=blue]{hyperref}
begin{document}
cite{Riess_2009}
bibliography{References}
end{document}
Correct answer by Mico on October 27, 2020
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP