TeX - LaTeX Asked on June 4, 2021
It seems to me that the package arydshln
breaks the package vhistory
.
Here is a MWE from the vhistory
CTAN documentation page:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{vhistory, hyperref}
begin{document}
begin{versionhistory}
vhEntry{1.0}{22.01.04}{AA}{created}
vhEntry{1.1}{23.01.04}{DP|JPW}{correction}
vhEntry{1.2}{03.02.04}{DP|JPW}{revised after review}
end{versionhistory}
end{document}
The output is as expected:
However, if you also load the package arydshln
documentclass{article}
usepackage{vhistory, hyperref}
usepackage{arydshln}
begin{document}
begin{versionhistory}
vhEntry{1.0}{22.01.04}{AA}{created}
vhEntry{1.1}{23.01.04}{DP|JPW}{correction}
vhEntry{1.2}{03.02.04}{DP|JPW}{revised after review}
end{versionhistory}
end{document}
The output becomes:
Any idea why this happens? Is there a way to prevent this problem, so that the functionality of both packages can be preserved? If not, is there an alternative package to arydshln
?
Thank you very much in advance.
The arydshln
package has often conflicted with other tabular packages (and vhistory
loads ltxtable
which loads longtable
and tabularx
). I thought these issues had been resolved, but maybe not. Loading arydshln
before vhistory
solves the problem, but it remains to be seen whether that breaks any specific arydshln
functionality (although it might not.)
I've added this as an answer, since it appears to work, but if this breaks arydshln
by doing so, then please comment on the answer.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{arydshln} % load before vhistory
usepackage{vhistory, hyperref}
begin{document}
begin{versionhistory}
vhEntry{1.0}{22.01.04}{AA}{created}
vhEntry{1.1}{23.01.04}{DP|JPW}{correction}
vhEntry{1.2}{03.02.04}{DP|JPW}{revised after review}
end{versionhistory}
end{document}
Answered by Alan Munn on June 4, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP