TeX - LaTeX Asked by Rashed Ahmad on June 10, 2021
I’m trying to do something similar to the proof in picture where there is a gap in the steps of the proof. I tried bussproofs-extra package, but it doesn’t let me make the dots from two inferences to converge towards one inference (i.e., similar to BinaryInf but dots leading to it from two UnaryInfs).
Any help would be highly appreciated!
For example, a sample without the dots would look like this:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{bussproofs}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{bussproofs-extra}
usepackage{amssymb,amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{prooftree}
deffCenter{mbox{ $vdash$ }}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInf$Gamma, varphi fCenter Delta$
AxiomC{}
UnaryInf$GammafCenter varphi, Delta$RightLabel{scriptsize Cut}
BinaryInf$ Gamma fCenter Delta$
end{prooftree}
end{document}
I have received an answer via twitter–thanks to Shawn Standefer! Here is how it's done:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{bussproofs}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{bussproofs-extra}
usepackage{amssymb,amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{prooftree}
deffCenter{mbox{ $vdash$ }}
AxiomC{}LeftLabel{scriptsize $square$}RightLabel{scriptsize $n$}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma fCenter varphi$}
AxiomC{}LeftLabel{scriptsize $square$}RightLabel{scriptsize $n$}
UnaryInfC{$Delta, varphi fCenter psi$}
noLine
BinaryInfC{$ddots reflectbox{$ddots$}$}
noLine
UnaryInfC{$vdots$}
noLine
UnaryInfC{$Gamma, Delta fCenter psi$}RightLabel{scriptsize Cut-Un-I, $n$}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma, Delta fCenter Un(ulcorner varphi urcorner)$}
end{prooftree}
end{document}
It requires reflectbox and use that as a binary inference. The noLine just removes the horizontal line of an inference.
Correct answer by Rashed Ahmad on June 10, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP