Sustainable Living Asked on October 1, 2021
Due to the recent COVID-19 outbreak and subsequent lockdowns in multiple countries, there have been reports of marked decreases in day-to-day pollution hanging over cities, such as this report on Beijing. This is being attributed in part to the lack of commuters going to work, with lots of workers across industries staying home under quarantine lockdown.
For some people, there is still the option to work from home. My question is, does working from home offer much from a sustainability perspective?
Take for example, a small office of 10 people, where:
vs those same 10 people working from home, having individual lighting, heating/cooling, appliances and supplies. There may be more points of comparison but these are the ones I can think of.
Which option is more sustainable, taking into account commuter transport, utilities, and so on? Have there been any studies done to this effect?
Here's a piece of the answer for the U.S. Hopefully others can provide additional details covering other countries or regions.
MAJOR EDIT: Comments pointed out that something seemed fishy. I double-checked my numbers, and at one point I multiplied by 1,000 when I should have divided. Turns out that makes a HUGE difference.
According to the U.S. Energy Information Agency (from Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey 2012), there are 33.8 million office workers using 1.5 billion m2 of non-vacant office space in the U.S. (looking at office work only since it is the most likely candidate for the switch to telework).
CBECS also provides data on energy usage for office buildings:
On average in the U.S., emissions factors for each of these fuels are as follows:
Thus total annual emissions from office buildings is 364 million tons, or 10.77 tons per office worker per year.
According to a 2005 poll, the average American commutes 32 miles (51 km) a day. According to the same poll, 4% use public transit, and 8% carpool. If we assume the average carpool is two people, this means that 92% of office workers are driving 51 km a day -- about 31 million workers driving a total of 1.6 billion km per day. There are about 250 working days per year, so that equates to 400 billion km per year.
In the U.S., the average efficiency of vehicles on the road was 22.3 miles per gallon in 2017. This equates to 10.6 L per 100 km. Combined with km driven, this means Americans are using 42 billion L of gasoline per year to commute.
Combustion of gasoline results in emissions of 8.89 kg CO2 per gallon, or 2.35 kg CO2 per L.
Thus total annual emissions from workers commuting to offices is 99 billion tons, or 2.93 tons per office worker per year.
There are series of assumptions and approximations here (please check my math, again!), but for the average office worker who commutes in a private vehicle in the U.S., emissions from the office are nearly triple the emissions from the drive.
If we say (for arguments' sake) that emissions from a home office per capita are the same as an office building per capita, then eliminating the commute results in a 20% reduction in emissions.
To fully understand the question, we'd need data on increased residential energy usage from teleworking. There are some estimates (here and here), but nothing thorough that I could find.
Correct answer by LShaver on October 1, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP