Sports Asked on July 3, 2021
I ask this because in 2018 John Isner and Kevin Anderson had a set that latest for 50 games in one set. And in 2010, John Isner and Nicolas Mahut had a set lasting 138 games.
I understand that to win a set you must win by 2 games. So is it possible for a tennis match to actually last forever if the winner of a game kept alternating each game? Or is there a time/score limit where the officials call it?
Depending on the competition it is very well possible to have a match last forever. Tennis itself has no rules about a time limit. See the longest match ever played, which took 11 hours in total. Matches without a tie break in the last set are prone to take longest.
I can't verify the rules for every competition, so here are a few majors:
In Wimbledon they've changed the rules to have a tie break after a score of 12-12 in the last set, so it will be a lot harder to have matches lasting that long.
The Australian Open followed Wimbledon by introducing a final set tie break.
That leaves the French Open as the last Grand Slam without a tie break in the final set and they seem to keep it that way.
(The US Open already have a tie break rule)
Correct answer by dly on July 3, 2021
The answer depends on the scoring system used. If traditional scoring is used, then a single GAME can last forever if the score keeps going to deuce (i.e. a game is won by the first player to win four points, with a two point advantage).
A single set could last forever if tiebreaker scoring is not used (see Isner-Mahut match).
Answered by user2438292 on July 3, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP