Role-playing Games Asked on November 21, 2021
I do not see Protection recommended in many places. It seems like it might be considered in the community to not be as good as other options. Is it actually subpar, and if so, why? Is disadvantage on an attack not good?
It is great when it works, but cannot always be used, does not do anything half the time, and costs your reaction even when it did nothing.
Why would you feel disappointed? Let's go through all the possible rolls (assume the DM usually uses the red d20, the green only comes out for Advantage / Disadvantage)
Obviously the last one does not happen this way every time. Still, even if you succeed, each time an enemy rolls higher later in the round, you will feel regret not preventing that one instead.
I will assume the enemy has 55% hit chance against the protected ally, 45% against you (you must have a shield for Protection), and compare using Protection on your ally, or Defense on yourself.
If the enemy has 55% hit chance before disadvantage, it goes down to 30.25% (0.55 * 0.55), 24.75% gain.
This decreases the enemy's hit chance from 45% to 40%, a 5% gain.
Protection can only be used once per round, so if you are attacked 5 times in a round, Defense is better. If you consider that Protection needs careful positioning and will not be usable every round, they prevent about equal amount of damage to the party per encounter1.
The benefits are equal, but not the costs. Defense is always on, but Protection consumes your reaction, preventing better uses of it2.
Answered by András on November 21, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP