Quantum Computing Asked on April 21, 2021
So I was wondering about the following:
I can encode an algorithm in position $hat x$ in quantum mechanics.
However, in QFT position is not an operator it becomes a parameter $x$.
Has anyone expressed concern that quantum field theory (QFT) will become relevant in the scale-up when creating a quantum computer and thus one should be careful about the second quantization of operators?
QFT (more specifically QED) is already at the heart of quantum computation. Second quantization formalism is used even in constructing toy models for quantum computers (see e.g., Section 7.3.2 of Nielsen and Chuang).
Many of the rapid advances in superconducting quantum processors over the past decade can be attributed to the introduction of circuit Quantum Electrodynamics (cQED, introduced here and here, full exposition, lecture notes), and the closely related introduction of the transmon (here). As suggested by the nomenclature these architectures are built on QED rather than non-relativistic QM.
Correct answer by Jonathan Trousdale on April 21, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP