Quantitative Finance Asked on December 12, 2021
Arbitrage Pricing Theory makes the implication that statistical factors (i.e. those that explain covariances) imply pricing factors (i.e. those that explain returns).
Is the reverse implication (i.e. pricing factor –> statistical factor) also true? If not, what are some common pricing factors that do not explain covariances? I can only think of transactional factors (e.g. merger arb) but didn’t know if there was a broader taxonomy of pricing-but-not-statistical factors.
Yes at least in theory. Assume there are lot of stocks, each being of type A or type B. Let, the return of type A stock $i$ and B stock $j$ be
$$r_{t,i}^{A}=mu_A+epsilon_t^{i}$$
$$r_{t,j}^{B}=mu_B+epsilon_t^{j}$$
where $epsilon_t^{i}$ and $epsilon_t^{j}$ are independent white noise. Now the return of a stock is uncorrelated with that of any other stock or any factor except its own return. However, being of type A or type B determines the expected return.
You might try to come up with some behavioral reason why e.g. A type stocks have higher expected returns. However, it might be hard to find such characteristics likely because they tend to imply statistical arbitrage opportunities. In practice for example all value stocks tend to move together.
Answered by fesman on December 12, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP