Physics Asked on January 6, 2022
Thermionic Conversion follows the classic Richardson-Dushmann Equation for thermionic current as a function of temperature squared:
$$J_{RD} = A_0 T^2 expleft(-frac{phi}{k_B T}right)$$
where
But thermal power loss is a function of the fourth power of temperature following the Stefan-Boltzmann law:
begin{equation}
P=Asigma T^4
end{equation}
where
Although I see a lot of talk about space charge buildup being the limiting factor on thermionic conversion efficiency, the power of 2 disadvantage from thermal radiation losses seems to make thermionic conversion a fundamentally impractical approach to approximating Carnot efficiency.
What am I missing?
According to this article, "Thermionic Energy Conversion in the Twenty-first Century: Advances and Opportunities for Space and Terrestrial Applications", the thermal radiation actually is a design concern.
You mention two power laws, and yes it does imply that at high temperatures the efficiency must drop, but it also equally implies that at low enough temperatures, the effect of the thermal radiation must become negligible.
The power of the power law is not the only thing, and in evaluating whether a technology sinks or swims, it comes down to a practical question of what are the actual coefficients, etc., and what is the final tradeoff that gets made in engineering.
Answered by Nanite on January 6, 2022
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP