Physics Asked on November 6, 2021
When deriving the stefan boltzmann law from planks law. You may make a substitution (http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/stefan2.html). This substitution will lead to a stray minus sign in the equation. The rest of the derivation seems to just ignore the minus sign. Is there a reason for this?
When you substitute
$$x=frac{hc}{lambda kT}$$
the limits of the integral also get reversed since
$$x=0iff lambdato inftyquadrm{and}quad xto infty ifflambda=0$$
Thus removing/cancelling the minus sign is completely justified.
Answered by user258881 on November 6, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP