Physics Asked on June 24, 2021
What’s the common term for PMF in statistical physics?
Is it plausible to use the chemists’ PMF even in non-equilibrium systems that don’t follow the canonical ensemble rules or Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution?
Is writing the following valid?
$$
mathcal{P}(x) = frac{int dmathbf{q} , delta[x-x(mathbf{q})] exp(-E(mathbf{q})/k_BT)}{int dmathbf{q} , exp(-E(mathbf{q})/k_BT)}
equiv frac{mathcal{Q}(x)}{Q}
$$
Where $ mathcal{Q}(x)$ is the partition function.
Independently of being part of the physicists or chemists community, PMF has not a unique definition. Some forms of PMF have been introduced many decades ago in different contexts and I would advice to cross check what is the exact definition used in a given context.
Whatever is its definition, the potential of mean force embodies a statistical average which depends on the kind of macroscopic state (equilibrium or out of equilibrium) and even for equilibrium states, for finite size systems it depends on the chosen ensemble. Therefore, use of a PMF obtained in an equilibrium ensemble for non-equilibrium calculations is not a fully consistent procedure, although it could be seen as an approximation.
Finally, the expression for the probability density $mathcal{P}(x)$ is perfectly valid. Its intuitive meaning is to sum the probability of all the states such that the function $x({bf q})$ is equal to $x$.
Answered by GiorgioP on June 24, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP