Trying to intuitively understand Christoffel symbols

Question

I recently watched Sean Carroll's YouTube series on "The Biggest Ideas in the Universe". In his Geometry and Topology video, he says that the connection in Riemannian geometry describes how a vector gets parallel transported through the geometry.
I looked more into it and found that the Christoffel symbols are an array of numbers that describe the metric connection which itself describes how the basis varies from point to point.
The formula for the Christoffel symbols of the first kind is $Gamma_{kij} = frac{partial vec{e_{i}}}{partial x^j} cdot vec{e_k}$. I'm trying to understand this formula intuitively, specifically how it describes how the covariant basis varies from point to point.
It seems to describe the projection of the rate of change of $vec{e_i}$ with respect to the $x^j$ direction onto $vec{e_k}$. As I understand it, this means that $frac{partial vec{e_{i}}}{partial x^j}$  is a vector that represents the change in the covariant basis vector $vec{e_i}$ when you move in the $x^j$ direction. This resulting derivative vector then has components/projections along each covariant basis direction $vec{e_k}$. So the Christoffel symbol describes the components/projections of each of these derivative vectors along each of the covariant basis directions at various points.
Is this the correct intuition behind the Christoffel symbols or do I have a misconception somewhere?
Also if this intuition is correct, I couldn't seem to get similar intuition for the Christoffel symbols of the second kind. Their definition is $Gamma ^k_{ij} = frac{partial vec{e_i}}{partial x^j} cdot vec{e^k}$.
But I don't know how to intuitively grasp the projection onto $vec{e^k}$ because the contravariant basis vectors $vec{e^k}$ are vectors orthogonal to the covariant basis directions right? I guess the symbols of the second kind would be the projections of the derivatives onto the various directions orthogonal to the covariant basis?

J. Murray · Accepted Answer

Yes, that's about the size of it.  If you want to test your intuition, consider polar coordinates on a Euclidean plane.  At a point $(r,theta)$, the orthonormal polar basis vectors $hat e_r$ and $hat e_theta$ are given by
$$hat e_r = cos(theta) hat e_x + sin(theta) hat e_y$$
$$hat e_theta = -sin(theta) hat e_x + cos(theta) hat e_y$$
where $hat e_x$ and $hat e_y$ are the standard Cartesian unit vectors.  Clearly $hat e_r$ and $hat e_theta$ change as you wander around the plane.  One has that
$$frac{partial hat e_r}{partial r} = frac{partial hat e_theta}{partial r} = 0 $$
$$frac{partial hat e_r}{partial theta} = hat e_theta$$
$$frac{partial hat e_theta}{partial theta} = -hat e_r$$
As a result, in this coordinate system there are only two nonzero Christoffel symbols:
$$Gamma_{theta r theta} = 1$$
$$Gamma_{rthetatheta} = -1$$
The remaining six are all zero.  Because the metric is $g_{ij}=pmatrix{1&0&1}$ in this basis, these are trivially related to the Christoffel symbols of the second kind,
$$Gamma^i_{j k} = g^{im}Gamma_{mjk}$$
The Christoffel symbols of the second kind $Gamma^i_{jk}$ is the $i^{th}$ component of $frac{partial hat e_k}{partial e_j}$. That is, when we say
$frac{partial hat e_r}{partial theta} = hat e_theta$,
it follows immediately that the $theta$ component of the vector on the right hand side is equal to $1$, i.e. $Gamma^theta_{theta r} = 1$.

The Euclidean plane is flat, of course, so if you calculate e.g. the Riemann tensor, you would find that all of the components vanish.  This would be a nice, quick exercise.

Trying to intuitively understand Christoffel symbols

One Answer

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question