Physics Asked on May 1, 2021
Question 1.
Let’s say that the wavefunction is given in the form
$$Psi(x, t) = Ae^{i(kx-wt)}$$
Then because of the normalisation condition, the following should hold.
$$int Psi^*Psi dx = A^2 int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-i(kx-wt)}times e^{i(kx-wt)} dx = 1$$
Because $e^{-i(kx-wt)}times e^{i(kx-wt)} = e^{-i(kx-wt) + i(kx-wt)} = 1$, the condition demands that
$$A^2 int_{-infty}^{infty} dx = 1$$
As the integral value diverges to $+infty$, we reach the conclusion that $A$ should converge to zero.
What’s wrong here?
Question 2.
This is another question that should be classified and asked separately but as it is a short one I will just put this one into here. When expressing the wavefunction as a linear combination of basis functions, especially in discrete cases, is it that the index varies from $-infty$ to $infty$? That means, is it that
$$Psi(x) = sum_{-infty}^{infty} c_i psi_i ?$$
Apologies in advance if the questions are trivial. I am a newcomer to quantum mechanics.
(1) Nothing wrong there. Plane waves are states of infinitely precise momentum and cannot be properly normalized in position space due to having infinite spread from Heisenberg uncertainty. In practice they still help e.g. in the scattering matrix formalism to get an amplitude for reflection and an amplitude for transmission, and to settle e.g. the basic physics of an Aharonov-Bohm ring where the actual lengths one cares about are finite.
(2) You always can and you never have to. There is a bijection between $mathbb Z$ and $mathbb N$ so however you number things is up to you. There is a slight reason to prefer $mathbb N$ which is that a large class of these basis states are eigenfunctions of a Hamiltonian which is bounded from below, and thus these eigenvalues go on infinitely in one direction but not the other.
Correct answer by CR Drost on May 1, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP