TransWikia.com

Killing vector index manipulation

Physics Asked on February 9, 2021

I was doing some problems of the book "Problem Book in Relativity and Gravitation by A. Lightman, R. H. Price" and on problem 10.14 I dont understand why they say:

$xi^{}_{gamma;beta}xi^{gamma}xi^{beta}=xi^{}_{(gamma;beta)}xi^{gamma}xi^{beta}=0$

Also on their final step they use the killing equation in order to switch the indicies but there is a minus sign involved with that and it doesn´t appear in the expression:

a$^{}_{a}=frac{xi^{}_{beta;alpha}xi^{beta}}{xi^{}_{gamma}xi^{gamma}}$

What am I missing?

One Answer

If $xi^a$ is a Killing vector then Killing's equation says that $xi_{a;b}$ is antisymmetric. It follows that, when completely contracted with a symmetric tensor, it will give zero. But $xi^a xi^b$ is a symmetric tensor. Thus I do both steps in one go. But if you want to separate the two steps, then the argument is as follows. Step 1: any second rank tensor can be written as a sum of symmetric and antisymmetric parts: $$ xi_{a;b} = xi_{(a;b)} + xi_{[a;b]} $$ so $$ xi_{mu;nu} xi^mu xi^nu = xi_{(mu;nu)}xi^mu xi^nu + xi_{[mu;nu]}xi^mu xi^nu = xi_{(mu;nu)}xi^mu xi^nu $$ where the second step is an example of the general fact that when you contract something (here $xi_{a;b}$) with a symmetric tensor (here $xi^a xi^b$), then the antisymmetric part of the first thing will not contribute (its contribution to the total will be zero). Now step 2: if $xi^a$ is a Killing vector then its covariant derivative is antisymmetric so $xi_{(a;b)} = 0$.

I think the above should settle your question about the $a_a$ equation too.

Answered by Andrew Steane on February 9, 2021

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP