TransWikia.com

Is nematic ordering time-reversal invariant?

Physics Asked by user165990 on March 5, 2021

I am confused about the definition of nematic order in crystals. In this paper https://www.nature.com/articles/nmat4138, they say that nematic order is “a lowering of the rotational symmetry while time-reversal invariance is preserved”, while in this paper https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys3456, they say that it is just when “the crystal rotation symmetry is spontaneously broken”. Which is it, and why?

One Answer

Nematic ordering is a breakdown of rotational symmetry, and does not involve breaking time-reversal symmetry. The two references you give do not contradict each other, the first just emphasizes that time-reversal symmetry is preserved.

This fact is obvious when you look at the isotropic to nematic transition of liquid crystals (where nematicity originated from essentially). Here you have the polymers start out randomly oriented, and then they order by lining up. If you just look at the phase where the polymers are lined up, nothing changes by reversing time, it is simply a spatial ordering.

Take a look at the image below, which emphasizes that nematic/smectic/crystalline transitions are simply spatial orderings.

https://openi.nlm.nih.gov/imgs/512/208/2808010/PMC2808010_ijms-10-04772f1.png

Answered by KF Gauss on March 5, 2021

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP