Physics Asked on July 18, 2021
Others have asked in general about cases in which the action integral is not minimized, but my question is specific: Can we show that the conventional action integral is always maximized for a system at stable equilibrium?
My reasoning is as follows. The conventional action integral is
$$S=int_{t_{1}}^{t_{2}}(T-U)dt$$
At static equilibrium (whether stable or unstable), we have that the kinetic energy is identically zero and the potential energy is constant in time. Thus it would seem that, for any static equilibrium configuration, the action reduces to
$$S=-UDelta t$$
We know that for stable equilibrium configurations, the potential energy is minimized (the principle of minimum potential energy). Since $S=-UDelta t$, and $Delta t$ is positive, it would seem that $S$ and $U$ have opposite signs, so that when $U$ is minimized, $S$ is maximized.
Is my logic sound? Or am I oversimplifying?
We assume OP is investigating an action functional of the form $$S~=~int_{t_i}^{t_f}! dt ~L, qquad L~=~T(q,dot{q})-V(q),$$ with boundary conditions (BCs).
The classical solution(s) (i.e. solutions to the EL equations satisfying the BCs) do not necessarily minimize/maximize the action, cf. e.g. this Phys.SE post.
For generic BCs, a solution will not be static, i.e. a constant solution at a stationary point $q_0$ of the potential $V$. In order to have a static solution, the BCs should be Dirichlet BCs $$ q^j(t_i)~=~q^j_0~=~q^j(t_f), $$ where $q^j_0$ is a stationary points of the potential $V$. Then the stabile solutions are minimum points for the potential $V$. However, these are not necessarily maximum path for the action $S$, cf. pt. 2 and OP's title question.
Finally let us assume that the kinetic term $T$ is absent even off-shell, i.e. the Lagrangian $L=-V$ is static. (Consider e.g. non-relativistic massless point particles.) Then BCs would over-constrain the system, so we should also remove the BCs to be consistent. Then the classical solutions will be static solutions. Then the stabile solutions are minimum (maximum) points for the potential $V$ (Lagrangian $L$), respectively, cf. OP's title question.
Correct answer by Qmechanic on July 18, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP