Physics Asked on May 24, 2021
I have recently been trying to understand this paper. So far I understand why, given a free fermionic state $|psirangle$, it is fully characterised by its 2-point correlation matrix (i.e. obeys Wicks’s theorem). I also understand why if its reduced density matrix $rho = text{Tr}_C(|psiranglelangle psi|)$ obeys Wick’s theorem, that is $C_{ij} = text{Tr}(rho c^{dagger}_ic_j)$ fully characterises $rho$, then $rho$ must be gaussian (or the exponential of a free fermionic Hamiltonian, i.e. $rho sim exp(-sum_{ij}h_{ij}c^{dagger}_ic_j)$ ).
But why does $rho$ in the first place need to obey Wick’s theorem?
I was thinking about it and all I could come up with was that $rho sim sum_n a_n |tildepsi_nrangle langle tildepsi_n|$ where $|tilde psi_nrangle$ is the part of eigenstate $|psi_nrangle$ not in subsystem $C$. However, from my previous questions and specially with the help of @NorbertSchuch, I have gathered that in general that form for $rho$ is not gaussian $iff$ doesn’t obey Wick’s theorem. So I’m certainly missing something!
From the point of view of Wick's theorem, this should be obvious:
If you can express any $N$-point correlator of operators acting on part A of the system through the corresponding two-point correlators, then this does not depend on the fact whether you trace the other part B of the system or not - that's precisely the point of the partial trace, it describes the same A part of the system (just without requiring to talk about B).
And as we have established previously, a state is fully specified by all its $N$-point correlation functions.
Correct answer by Norbert Schuch on May 24, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP