Physics Asked by Rinchen Chosdol on May 25, 2021
I have done this experiment to find out the equivalent focal length of a combination of 2 convex lenses of slightly different focal length and have applied the formula for the equivalent focal length separated by a distance $d$.
But I am not able to understand how to verify it.
Is there any other way we can determine the same using $u$, $v$, distance between the lenses or something?
I have been asked to find it out ‘experimentally’ without using formula and then tally it with the answers I have got using the formula.
Forget—for a moment—that the system under discussion is two lens. Just focus on the question
How do I make an experimental measurement of the focal length of [an optical element]?
For instance, how would you measure the focal length of a single convex lens? (The problem is considerably harder if the optical element is diverging, BTW, so let's focus on the converging part of the problem to start.)
Now, this is a very basic problem and there is a well known answer: you measure the image distance when projecting a very distant object. That is, you hold the lens up near a screen and move it around until you get a crisp image of the landscape seen through the laboratory window, and the distance from the lens to the screen is is the focal length. (You may want to darken the room before starting.)
To see why this works look at the thin lens formula:1 $$ frac{1}{f} = frac{1}{d_o} + frac{1}{d_i} ;, tag{1}$$ and notice that is $d_o gg f$ and $d_o gg d_i$ then the fraction $1/d_o$ is much smaller than either of the other fractions and we can simplify (1) to $$ frac{1}{f} approx frac{1}{d_i} $$ or even $$ f approx d_i ;.$$.
Finally, we need to pay attention to the fact that our optical element is a compound system and probably isn't "thin". As it turns out the only adjustment we need to make is defining2
If your two-element system is diverging, then the measurement requires you to combine it with a third element that is converging. But the pattern "figuring out how to do the measurement without worrying too much about the nature of the system being measured" remains the same.
1 With a two (or more) element system the word "thin" probably doesn't apply anymore, but we can fudge it by choosing the right definitions for object distance and image distance.
2 Question for the student: how do the rules for treating multi-element systems imply that these are the natural definitions of $d_o$ and $d_i$?
Answered by dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten on May 25, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP