Physics Asked on June 2, 2021
I have searched everywhere I know to look but I cannot find out how Hamilton’s equations deal with non-conservative forces. In my understanding, Lagrangian mechanics deals with this as follows: the Euler-Lagrange equations no longer have a zero on the right, they have a term $$Sigma F_q$$ that is the sum of all the non-conservative forces encountered in the direction of the coordinate q.
begin{equation}
frac{d}{dt} frac{partial L}{partial dot{q}} – frac{partial L}{partial q}=Sigma F_q(t)
end{equation}
The only document I have been able to find about how hamiltonian mechanics deals with non-conservative forces has been: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00692025
It requires you to buy it and I felt like just the plain equations and a little context for an example like a box sliding down a hill against friction would be enough.
Lorentz force is an example of non-conservative conservative force that is discussed in pretty much any theoretical mechanics textbook. The Lagrangian is: $$L = frac{m}{2}dot{mathbf{r}}cdotdot{mathbf{r}} + q mathbf{A}(mathbf{r})cdotdot{mathbf{r}} - qphi(mathbf{r}),$$ from which the momentum, the Hamiltonian, and the Hamilton equations follow as usual.
Answered by Roger Vadim on June 2, 2021
If a variational formulation of Lagrange equations exists (e.g. because of the existence of a generalized velocity-dependent potential $U(q,dot{q},t)$ for the forces in the problem), then we can in principle derive a Hamiltonian formulation via a Legendre transformation in the standard manner.
If no variational Lagrangian formulation exists for Lagrange equations $$begin{align}frac{d}{dt}frac{partial L}{partial dot{q}^j}-frac{partial L}{partial q^j}~=~&Q_j, cr j~in~& {1,ldots, n}, end{align}tag{L}$$ but the Lagrangian $L$ is regular/non-degenerate, then we may still derive a Hamiltonian $H$ via a Legendre transformation. However Hamilton's equations get modified $$begin{align} dot{q}^j~=~frac{partial H}{partial p_j}, & qquad dot{p}_j+frac{partial H}{partial q^j}~=~Q_j, cr j~in~&{1,ldots, n}. end{align}tag{H}$$ So there is no conventional Hamiltonian formulation. Nevertheless, several unconventional approaches exist, cf. this related Phys.SE post.
Answered by Qmechanic on June 2, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP