TransWikia.com

How can an asymptotic expansion give an extremely accurate prediction, as in QED?

Physics Asked by yonni on June 8, 2021

What is the meaning of "twenty digits accuracy" of certain QED calculations? If I take too little loops, or too many of them, the result won’t be as accurate, so do people stop adding loops when the result of their calculation best agrees with experiment? I must be missing something.

One Answer

Suppose you're interested in computing some quantity $F(alpha)$, like the excess magnetic moment $g-2$, which depends on the fine structure constant $alpha simeq .007$.

Perturbation theory gives a recipe for the coefficients $F_i$ of an infinite series $sum_{i geq 0} F_i alpha^i$, which is expected to be asymptotic to $F$. This means that, if you add up the first few terms, you should get a decent approximation to $F$.

$F simeq F_0 + F_1 alpha + F_2 alpha^2 + F_3 alpha^3 + ... + F_N alpha^N$

If you keep adding higher order corrections, making $N$ bigger, the approximation will get better for a while, and then, eventually, it will start to get worse and diverge in the limit $N to infty$. In QED, we don't know exactly where the approximation gets worse. However, one expects on general grounds that the series approximation will start to get worse when $N simeq 1/alpha simeq 137$. (And this is indeed what we see in toy models, where we can make everything completely rigorous.)

In principle, then, we should add up all the Feynman diagrams of order $leq 137$. In practice, we don't have the ability to do this. Computing all those diagrams is very time-consuming. Even with computer assistance, we have difficulty going beyond 4 or 5 loops.

Answered by user1504 on June 8, 2021

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP