Physics Asked on July 9, 2021
I’m trying to calculate the symmetric traceless tensor for the octupole moment in cartesian coordinates… I have to deal with the electrostatic potential of the form:
$Phi^{(4)}(textbf{r})=int d^{3}r^{prime}rho(textbf{r}^prime)bigg[frac{1}{3!}partial^{prime}_{k}partial^{prime}_{j}partial^{prime}_{i}bigg(frac{1}{|textbf{r}-textbf{r}^prime|}bigg)bigg|_{textbf{r}^prime=0}r_{i}^{prime}r_{j}^{prime}r_{k}^{prime}bigg]$
where the term in square brackets corresponds to the third term in the Taylor series of $1/|textbf{r}-textbf{r}^prime|$. Doing the partial derivatives, the electrostatic potential may be rewritten as:
$Phi^{(4)}(textbf{r})=frac{1}{3!r^{7}}bigg[15r_{i}r_{j}r_{k}-3(r_{i}delta_{jk}+r_{j}delta_{ik}+r_{k}delta_{ij})r^{2}bigg]C_{ijk}$
where $C_{ijk}=int d^{3}r^{prime}rho(textbf{r}^prime)r_{i}^{prime}r_{j}^{prime}r_{k}^{prime}$ is the non-traceless octupole moment tensor.
The question is: How can I rearrenge the expression for the potential so that I get something of the form:
$Phi^{(4)}(textbf{r})=frac{r_{i}r_{j}r_{k}}{3!r^{7}}Q^{(4)}_{ijk}$
where $Q^{(4)}_{ijk}$ is the symmetric traceless octupole moment tensor?
I'm surprised this hasn't been answered for more than a year, and this is the third link that comes up on google for "octupole moment". This derivation goes as follows:
For brevity I'll use this parentheses notation for a sum with cyclic permutations of indices: $$ A_{(i}B_{jk)} equiv A_iB_{jk}+A_jB_{ki}+A_kB_{ij}, $$
where $A_i$ and $B_{jk}$ are some tensors of order 1 and 2 respectively.
Let $A_{ijk}$ be a symmetric tensor of third order, and $B_{ijk}$ a symmetric tensor with an additional property that $B_{iij}=0$ (Einstein summation is implied throughout), in other words, its contraction with respect to any pair of indices is zero. We want to see how we can transform the expression $$A_{ijk}B_{ijk}.$$
First of all, notice that since $B_{ijk}$ has the contraction property, we can add to $A_{ijk}$ in the expression any tensor of the form $C_idelta_{jk}$ (and therefore, of the form $C_{(i}delta_{jk)}$), where $delta_{jk}$ is the Kronecker delta. This is because $$C_idelta_{jk}B_{ijk}=C_iB_{ijj}=0,$$ as $B_{ijj}=0$ by the property. Now we can choose $C_i=-frac15A_{mmi}$ and obtain:
$$ A_{ijk}B_{ijk}=[A_{ijk}-frac15A_{mm(i}delta_{jk)}]B_{ijk}. $$
The reason for that choice is that now the expression in brackets has the contraction property as you can check by contracting it with respect to any 2 indices. This lets us add any tensor of the form $C_idelta_{jk}$ to $B_{ijk}$ to obtain the final expression which we will use: $$ A_{ijk}B_{ijk}=[A_{ijk}-frac15A_{mm(i}delta_{jk)}][B_{ijk}+C_{(i}delta_{jk)}]. $$
Now going back to your problem, we have $A_{ijk}=r'_ir'_jr'_k$ and $B_{ijk}=15r_ir_jr_k-3r_{(i}delta_{jk)}r^2$, and obviously they satisfy the required properties, so using the formula we've just obtained: $$ A_{ijk}B_{ijk}=[r'_ir'_jr'_k][15r_ir_jr_k-3r_{(i}delta_{jk)}r^2]=[r'_ir'_jr'_k-frac15r_{(i}'delta_{jk)}r'^2][15r_ir_jr_k-3r_{(i}delta_{jk)}r^2+C_{(i}delta_{jk)}]=[r'_ir'_jr'_k-frac15r_{(i}'delta_{jk)}r'^2][15r_ir_jr_k], $$
where we've chosen $C_i=3r_ir^2$. Plugging it into your expression for the potential, we now obtain: $$ Phi^{(4)}(textbf{r})=int d^{3}r^{prime}rho(textbf{r}^prime)bigg[frac{1}{3!}partial^{prime}_{k}partial^{prime}_{j}partial^{prime}_{i}bigg(frac{1}{|textbf{r}-textbf{r}^prime|}bigg)bigg|_{textbf{r}^prime=0}r_{i}^{prime}r_{j}^{prime}r_{k}^{prime}bigg]= int d^{3}r^{prime}rho(textbf{r}^prime)bigg[frac{1}{3!r^7}[r_{i}^{prime}r_{j}^{prime}r_{k}^{prime}][15r_ir_jr_k-3r_{(i}delta_{jk)}r^2]bigg]=int d^{3}r^{prime}rho(textbf{r}^prime)bigg[frac{1}{3!r^7}[r'_ir'_jr'_k-frac15r_{(i}'delta_{jk)}r'^2][15r_ir_jr_k]bigg]=int d^{3}r^{prime}rho(textbf{r}^prime)bigg[frac{1}{3!r^7}[15r'_ir'_jr'_k-3r_{(i}'delta_{jk)}r'^2][r_ir_jr_k]bigg]=frac{r_ir_jr_k}{3!r^7}Q^{(4)}_{ijk}, $$ where
$$ Q^{(4)}_{ijk}=int d^{3}r^{prime}rho(textbf{r}^prime)[15r'_ir'_jr'_k-3r_{(i}'delta_{jk)}r'^2] $$ is the symmetric traceless octupole moment tensor you were looking for.
Correct answer by Igor Prudkyi on July 9, 2021
I ran into the same question, googled a bit and ended up getting myself a much simpler derivation, so I leave an answer for this 4-year-old question just for the record.
(I'm not sure if any textbook refers to this method - it is as clear as it seems and at least I brought up the proof by myself.)
If you notice that this question is essentially about the formula $$ (15r_{i}r_{j}r_{k}-3r_{[i}delta_{jk]}r^{2})r'_ir'_jr'_k $$ and finding the coefficient of $r_ir_jr_k$s(in terms of $r'_i$s) of it, this is a simple arithmetic problem so you can just expand it and group them appropriately. You don't need some magic tensors out from nowhere.
Okay, the answer is $$ 15r'_ir'_jr'_k-3r'{}_{[i}delta_{jk]}r'^2 $$ as given in the answer of Igor. You can verify it by laborious expansion, or by examining each possibilities of indices (namely, $i,j,k$ are distinct, exactly two are same, and all are same.)
But wait, it's the exact same formula from the original question, only $mathbf{r}$ replaced by $mathbf{r'}$! Observing the same phenomenon in quadrupole terms, we can generalize this to hexadecapoles and any higher $2^l$-pole terms.
Proposition. $1/|mathbf{r}-mathbf{r'}|$ can be expanded in a series $$ frac{1}{|mathbf{r}-mathbf{r'}|} = sum_{l=0}^{infty} frac{F_l (mathbf{r},mathbf{r'})}{r^{2l+1}} $$ where $F_l$ is a homogeneous polynomial of degree $2l$ ($l$ for each $mathbf{r},mathbf{r'}$), and most importantly $$ F_l (mathbf{r},mathbf{r'}) = F_l (mathbf{r'},mathbf{r}). $$
Proof. Try it yourself about the degree $l+l$ part, if you're doubtful. Observe that $$ frac{1}{|mathbf{r}-mathbf{r'}|} = frac{1}{|frac{r}{r'}mathbf{r'}-frac{r'}{r}mathbf{r}|} $$ where $frac{r}{r'}mathbf{r'}$ and $frac{r'}{r}mathbf{r}$ are just vectors $mathbf{r'}$ and $mathbf{r}$, only their magnitudes interchanged.
Applying the series expression to RHS, you get $$ sum_{l=0}^{infty} frac{F_l (mathbf{r},mathbf{r'})}{r^{2l+1}} = sum_{l=0}^{infty} frac{F_l (frac{r}{r'}mathbf{r'},frac{r'}{r}mathbf{r})}{r^{2l+1}} $$ but due to the homogeneousness, $$ F_l left(frac{r}{r'}mathbf{r'},frac{r'}{r}mathbf{r}right) = left(frac{r}{r'}right)^l left(frac{r'}{r}right)^l F_l (mathbf{r'},mathbf{r}) = F_l (mathbf{r'},mathbf{r}) $$ hence we obtain $$ sum_{l=0}^{infty} frac{F_l (mathbf{r},mathbf{r'})}{r^{2l+1}} = sum_{l=0}^{infty} frac{F_l (mathbf{r'},mathbf{r})}{r^{2l+1}} $$ comparing each terms, we conclude that $F_l$ is symmetric. $Box$
Alternatively, you can figure out that $F_l (mathbf{r},mathbf{r'})$ is just the Legendre polynomial $P_l(cos gamma)$ times $r^l r'^l$, where $gamma$ is the angle between $mathbf{r}$ and $mathbf{r'}$.
This also explains why multipole tensors are traceless - because $1/|mathbf{r}-mathbf{r'}|$ is harmonic!
In particular, we know that $$ frac{F_l (mathbf{r},mathbf{r'})}{r^{2l+1}} = partial'_{i_1} cdots partial'_{i_l} left. left(frac{1}{|mathbf{r}-mathbf{r'}|} right)right|_{mathbf{r'}=0} r'_{i_1}cdots r'_{i_l} $$ But if we write $F_l(mathbf{r},mathbf{r'})= M_{i_1 cdots i_l} (mathbf{r'}) r_{i_1}cdots r_{i_l}$, we also have $F_l(mathbf{r},mathbf{r'})= M_{i_1 cdots i_l} (mathbf{r}) r'_{i_1}cdots r'_{i_l}$ so $$ M_{i_1 cdots i_l} (mathbf{r}) = partial'_{i_1} cdots partial'_{i_l} left. left(frac{1}{|mathbf{r}-mathbf{r'}|} right)right|_{mathbf{r'}=0} r^{2l+1} $$ contracting two indices $i_a = i_b = i$ of the tensor sums up to zero because $partial'_i partial'_i (1/|mathbf{r}-mathbf{r'}|)=0$.
Answered by Paul Sohn on July 9, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP