TransWikia.com

Domain of the infinite square well hamiltonian

Physics Asked by Jiang-min Zhang on December 20, 2020

I am reading the book by Gitman et al. ‘self-adjoint extensions in quantum mechanics’.

In the book, they give a precise definition of the domain of the hamiltonian of an infinite square well.

For me, the point is that, if a wave function belongs to the domain, then itself and its first derivative should be absolutely continuous. This means the tent function below is not in the domain—its first derivative is discontinuous.

This is somehow surprising to me. As I remember, we had excercises in which we were asked to expand the function in terms of the eigenstates of the well. We can then evolve the state in time. Everything seems okay.

So, what is the problem with this state? Why should we rule it out from quantum mechanics?

enter image description here

One Answer

The simple answer to this problem is that the second partial derivative of one of the canonical variables appears in the Schrödinger equation when working with a continuous basis. In most problems this is the spatial coordinate as in $$ ihbarfrac{partial}{partial t} psi(x, t) = -frac{hbar^2}{2m}frac{partial^2}{partial x^2}psi(x,t) + Phi(x)psi(x,t) $$ for the case of one dimension, which is applicable to your example, but it can also be the electric field among other things.

Since quantum mechanical states are required to be normalizeable, as their squared norm is interpreted as a probability density, a discontinous first derivative leads to problems in the temporal evolution of the state. The second derivative of this function would then potentially blow up the norm of the state, which breaks the interpretation as a probability density.

Answered by Halbeard on December 20, 2020

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP