Does viscosity arise from the increase in intertia created by the movement of molecules?

Cohesion is how strongly a substance holds itself together, and viscosity has been described as the substance’s internal friction. Viscosity has mostly been explained to me via allusions to substances that have a high viscosity, like syrup. To me, it seems intuitive that viscosity would be the emergent phenomenon resulting from molecules being strongly connected to each other. I mean, it makes sense; it’s harder to pull your hand through the substance because the substance internal connectivity is giving you more resistance. However, that’s apparently not the case, since cohesion is the word for the collective strenght of the molecular bonds, and viscosity is something else. Also, water has pretty strong molecular bonds, dipole hydrogen bonds, but isn’t very viscous.

So, I created this hypothesis, and I’d like to see if it is true or not. Substances consisting of non-polar molecules are more viscous, because the molecules are held together by London Dispersion Forces (LDF), instead of dipole-dipole bonds. Now, LDF works via temporary polarization, which sometimes happens spontaneously due to the random movement of electrons, but usually happens through induction via a dipole nearby (which can be temporary or permanent). Basically, there is created a charge imbalance across the molecule or atom, because electrons do not stand still. This charge imbalance makes it a temporary dipole, which will make it e.g. negative pole move towards the nearest temporary dipole’s positive pole.

These temporary dipoles are being made all the time, very quickly, which creates an ocean of chaotically pullinh and pushing electrostatic forces, which creates a lot of movement. All that movement increase the inertia of the molecules, which increases the energy needed to displace them. So, when you pull your hand through this substance, you don’t just have to overcome the inertia created by the molecules’ mass, but also the intertia created by their constant movement.

Is this hypothesis true or close to the truth?