TransWikia.com

Deviations from purely circular orbit for an object in a Yukawa potential

Physics Asked on March 25, 2021

I am struggling with the logic for completing the following problem.

The problem is part b of 3.19 in Goldstein’s Classical Mechanics book.

A particle moves in a force field described by the Yukowa potential $$ V(r) = frac{k}{r} exp (-frac{r}{a}),
$$
where k and a are positive.

Show that if the orbit is nearly circular, the apsides will advance
approximately by $pi r_0 / a$ per revolution, where $r_0$ is the
radius of the circular orbit.

The following beautiful solution that I found online due to Professor Laura Reina at Florida State Uni has helped me get 75% of the way there.

The logic for solving this problem goes as follows:

Thinking about the following graph for $U_{eff}$ one can see that circular orbit (orbit at fixed radius) occurs when $U_{eff}$ is minimized. Solving $frac{d U_{eff}}{dr}=0$ gives us the value of $r_0$ from the statement of the problem.

Next, since the problem states "nearly" circular, we let r deviate slightly from $r_0$. I.e. we write r as a function of $theta$ (using r, $theta$ polar coordinates) in the following way

$$
r(theta) = r_0[1+delta(theta)]
$$

where $delta$ is a function of $theta$ like r since $r_0$ is not allowed to vary.

The next step is to plug this equation for $r(theta)$ into the so-called "orbit equation"

$$
frac{d^2}{dtheta^2} frac{1}{r(theta)} + frac{1}{r(theta)} = -frac{mr^2}{ell^2}F(r)
$$

where $F(r)$ can be found from the potential/force relation with the potential of the problem.

The usual substitution is then used $u=frac{1}{r}$, and in our case, by a binomial approximation, we have $u=frac{1}{r}frac{1}{r_0}(1-delta)$.

Via some algebra, one non-trivial part being expanding (one of!) the exponentials into its series expansion, we arrive at

$$
frac{d^2}{dtheta^2} delta(theta) + bigg(1-frac{mkr_o{}^2}{ell^2 a}e^{-frac{r_0}{a}}bigg)delta(theta) = 1-frac{mkr_o}{ell^2}e^{-frac{r_0}{a}}
$$

which, via Gert’s great answer here, is clearing simple harmonic motion.

Using the definition of $r_0$ from our first equation, we can identify the frequency squared coefficient of SHO as

$$
omega^2 = frac{1}{1+frac{r_0}{a}}
$$

Here is where I lose the logical progression of the solution.

  1. Can someone offer some intuition for what is going on when the author of the solution says,

Now choose $delta$ to be at maximum when $theta=0$, then the next maximum will occur when…

  1. The author’s next step is to find the change in $theta$ via $omegatheta=2pi$. I am completely lost as to why we can use this for a non-circular orbit.

I’m convinced my confusion lies in something simple I could garner from here or something similar, but I’ve been stuck here for hours. Any tips appreciated.

Some drawings to expound on where my confusion lies are below.

Our particle/object does not follow a perfectly circular orbit at radius $r_0$ but rather one at radius $r(theta)$ where again, $r(theta) = r_0[1+delta(theta)]$,

enter image description here

Now, there is nothing stopping us from picking a maximum value of $r(theta)$ and thus a max value of $delta(theta)$ since remember $r_0$ is fixed. But surely this is a maximum only for that particular revolution, no?! The question prompts us with

the apsides will advance
approximately by $pi r_0 / a$ per revolution

and so there is only natural that, after 20 revolutions let’s say, the value of $r(theta)$ and $delta(theta)$ are greater than they were previously.

enter image description here

One Answer

Recall that $delta(theta)$ is the deviation from the circular orbit. Choosing it to be maximum when $theta = 0$ is a matter of mathematical convenience so you don't need to deal with an initial phase $theta = theta_0$ or a "maximum" phase $theta = theta_{mathrm{max}}$.

Answered by wyphan on March 25, 2021

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP