Confusions on $U(1)_{A}$ problem

Question

In Cheng&Li's book "Gauge theory of elementary particle physics" section 16.3, the $U(1)$ problem is presented. Here is the story:
Suppose we have a theoy which contains only two quarks $q_1=u$ and $q_2=d$. The symmetry group is given by $SU(2)_Ltimes SU(2)_Rtimes U(1)_Vtimes U(1)_A$.
$U(1)_A$ is axial symmery, i.e., $q_irightarrow e^{ibeta gamma_5}q_i,i=1,2$. In the limit $m_{u,d} rightarrow 0$, the chiral current
begin{equation}
J^5_{mu}=bar{u}gamma_{mu}gamma_5u+bar{d}gamma_{mu}gamma_5d
end{equation}
does not seem to correspond any observed symmetry in hardon spectra. If the $U(1)_A$ is spontaneously broken, then a massles Goldstone boson will appear. But in experiment, no such particle is observed.
My confusion is: why do we expect a Goldstone boson? This $U(1)_A$ symmetry is based on the assumption "$m_{u,d} rightarrow 0$". But in the real world, both $m_u$ and $m_d$ are nonzero, i.e., we might have mass term like $bar{u}m_uu+bar{d}m_dd$. Therefore the $U(1)_A$ is not a symmetry. What is the logic and whole story here? I think I misunderstood something.

Cosmas Zachos · Accepted Answer

The short answer is the symmetry is explicitly broken, and spontaneously broken, at the very same time. (It is also anomalous, but this is not part of your question.)
Your text explains the "real world" issue better than most. It has already lavished chapters on explaining spontaneous/dynamical chiral symmetry breaking of the 3 axial  generators, whose Goldstone bosons, in the absence of quark masses, would have been the 3 flavored pseudoscalar mesons, πs. The corresponding Noether currents would be strictly conserved, in the ideal world.
In real life, the non-Abelian axial symmetries are approximate, PCAC, so
$$
partial ^mu J_mu^{a ~ 5}approx m bar q tau^a ~gamma_5q  qquad sim  f_pi m_a^2 phi ^a  neq 0,
$$
where m denotes linear combinations of quark masses you may compute for each broken generator. The Goldstone sombrero vacuum has tilted a little, and there is a small mass about a non-degenerate vacuum, as σ-model  fans illustrate with the σ term.
The 3 almost Goldstone bosons, then, are almost massless, being pseudogoldstone bosons, the dramatically light pions, the featherweights of the hadronic spectrum. It is all a perturbation  in the small quark masses normalized by the much bigger chiral symmetry breaking scale, m/v ~ 1/60 , two orders of magnitude!
The authors assume you would then expect, mutatis mutandis,  to echo this for the isosinglet axial current,
$$
partial ^mu J_mu^{5} =2i (m_u bar u gamma_5u + m_d  bar d gamma_5 d  )qquad sim  f_eta m_eta^2 ~eta  neq 0,
$$
by an analog of GOR/Dashen's formula, so a comparably light pseudogoldstone boson pseudoscalar.
But, as they detail, this, dramatically, fails to occur, because of the anomaly, seizing of the vacuum, etc, the interesting issues outranging your question, which they discuss.

Confusions on $U(1)_{A}$ problem

One Answer

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question