TransWikia.com

Cases where renormalisation isn't needed

Physics Asked by BJ boy on January 11, 2021

In quantum field theory I’ve came across splitting up a Lagrangian (which has an interaction part) into renormalized parts with counterterms. Are there any lagrangians for which renormalisation is not required? When do you know you need to introduce counterterms?

One Answer

Insertion of counterterms is needed, when you have certain non-vanishing diverging diagrams. For instance, the self-energy diagram in QED (Quantum Electrodynamics) for electrons leading to the mass renormalization, or polarization loop diagram for photon, which is logarithmically divergent, and renormalizes the charge.

One doesn't need counteterms definitely for the case of free theories, there is nothing to renormalize. It is a trivial example.

Less trivial case are the supersymmetric theories, where non-renormalization follows from the fact, that bosonic and fermionic contributions annihilate each other. One of the famous examples in non-renormalization of F-terms. Terms of form: $$ int d^4 theta W (Phi) $$ Where $W(Phi)$ is some superpotential of the superfield $Phi$ do no receive perturbative corrections. This can be proven via supergraphs, but the most beautiful argument due to N.Seiberg uses the power of holomorphy - https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9408013v1.

There is a nice review by S.Weinberg - https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9803099v1

Correct answer by spiridon_the_sun_rotator on January 11, 2021

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP