Physics Asked on January 4, 2022

In electrostatics we have

$$nabla cdot E = rho/varepsilon$$

and using the divergence theorem we get

$$int_{partialOmega} E cdot hat{n} dS = int_Omega rho/varepsilon dV.$$

This states that the electric flux out of the domain $Omega$ is equal to the total charge inside $Omega$. I think of this as the total ‘force’ that can be felt (by a charge) pushing outwards at the boundary.

Can the same thought process by applied to the steady state heat equation (I have no experience with thermodynamics). We have

$$nabla cdot (nabla T) = f$$

and using the divergence theorem we get

$$int_{partialOmega} nabla T cdot hat{n} dS = int_Omega f dV.$$

Is the temperature gradient completely analagous to the electric static field? Is it like a force pushing outwards? In electrostatics the flux is out of $Omega$ is always due to the charge density $rho$. Is $f$ some kind of density in thermostatics? Charge density can be thought of as a contiuum of charges, but what is $f$ a continuum of?

Even though there is a certain similarity between the two equations, the origins are quite different. Maxwell's equations can be derived from a gauge theory, while the heat equation is a special case of a diffusion phenomenon (and hence a special case of the more general diffusion equation). Also note that the more general expression of the heat equation is

$$rho c_pfrac{partial T}{partial t} - nablacdot(kappanabla T) = dot q$$

where $rho$ is the mass density, $c_p$ is the specific heat capacity, $dot q$ is the volumetric heat source, and $kappa$ is, in general, a tensor. If we look for stationary solutions (i.e. $partial_tT = 0$), for a homogeneous and isotropic medium (i.e. $kappa$ is a space-wise constant scalar) then the equation becomes

$$nabla^2 T = -frac1kappadot q.$$

The RHS can still be interpreted as a density of heat source in space, much like $rho$ in the electrostatic equation is a density of electric charge (divided by $varepsilon$). However, for the heat equation, we have a time derivative, $dot q$, that alludes to a (heat) *flux*, which is not the case for the charge density $rho$. Indeed, the electrostatic equation is not describing a diffusion phenomenon.

Answered by Phoenix87 on January 4, 2022

Get help from others!

Recent Questions

- How can I transform graph image into a tikzpicture LaTeX code?
- How Do I Get The Ifruit App Off Of Gta 5 / Grand Theft Auto 5
- Iv’e designed a space elevator using a series of lasers. do you know anybody i could submit the designs too that could manufacture the concept and put it to use
- Need help finding a book. Female OP protagonist, magic
- Why is the WWF pending games (“Your turn”) area replaced w/ a column of “Bonus & Reward”gift boxes?

Recent Answers

- Lex on Does Google Analytics track 404 page responses as valid page views?
- Peter Machado on Why fry rice before boiling?
- Joshua Engel on Why fry rice before boiling?
- haakon.io on Why fry rice before boiling?
- Jon Church on Why fry rice before boiling?

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP