TransWikia.com

4-dimensional Fourier transform of $(kcdot v)^{-1}$

Physics Asked by rootofunity on May 1, 2021

I have been trying to compute, without much success, the following Fourier transform in 4-dimensional Minkowski space

$$
I=frac{1}{(2pi)^4}int d^4 k ,frac{e^{ikcdot x}}{kcdot v},
$$

where $v^mu$ is any constant vector. $v^mu$ would be spacelike in my case, if that’s helpful. Do you have any ideas on how to do this? I suspect $I$ does not have a closed form.. but maybe can be expressed in terms of Bessel functions or something similar.

Disclaimer: although it’s practically a mathematical computation I felt asking the physics community would be more fitting, since this type of integrals are typical in QFT.

One Answer

If $v$ is spacelike, choose the $k$ axes so that $v$ has only a $z$ component, so that the integral written out explicitly is

$$begin{aligned} I &= frac{1}{(2pi)^4} int dk^t, dk^x, dk^y, dk^z, frac{e^{i(k^t t - k^x x - k^y y - k^z z)}}{-k^z v} &= -frac{1}{2pi v} delta(t) delta(x) delta(y) int dk^z, frac{e^{-ik^z z}}{k^z}, end{aligned}$$ e where $(t, x, y, z)$ are the components of $x^mu$ (with an abuse of notation in repeating $x$) in an orthonormal basis ${e_0, e_1, e_2, v}$ , so that

$$begin{gather} t = x cdot e_0 x = -x cdot e_1 y = -x cdot e_2 z = -x cdot v end{gather}$$

The last integral can be computed by a variety of methods; the simplest is to use the principal value to discard the cosine part, so that

$$int dk, frac{e^{-ikz}}{k} = -i int dk, frac{sin(kz)}{k} = -ipi operatorname{sgn}(z)$$

(The second link has a mysterious extra factor of $1/2$.)

Putting it all together, we have

$$I = frac{i}{2} delta(t)delta(x)delta(y) operatorname{sgn}(z),$$

or, written covariantly,

$$I = -frac{i}{2} left( prod_{i=0}^2 delta(x cdot e_i) right) operatorname{sgn}(x cdot v).$$

This last form emphasizes that the triple delta function is invariant under Lorentz transformations that leave $v$ fixed.

If $v$ is timelike, there are three sign changes: one from $kcdot v$, one in the exponent which ends up in front of the sign function, and a third from the expression of the $t$ inside the sign function (which used to be $z$ in the spacelike case) as a scalar product $t = x cdot v$, so the integral changes sign.

Correct answer by Javier on May 1, 2021

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP