TransWikia.com

Why is there not a protective glass element that is between the lens and shutter in a SLR?

Photography Asked by Dylansq on November 20, 2020

With the danger of dust on all SLR cameras, it only seems logical that adding a simple glass element that went between the lens and shutter (mounted on the camera) would both protect the camera’s interior and sensor from any intrusive particulate matter.

Logically thinking, I don’t think it should effect the picture quality at all, seeing how we have glass sky filters already.

There are a couple of questions that I have:

Are there any cameras that currently have this feature?

Would implementing this feature detract from the normal function of a camera?

Is this in any way impractical?

To clarify, the blue region is where the question refers to.
Camera Diagram

3 Answers

Image quality and possibly expense

Introducing yet another element in front of the sensor will degrade quality of the pictures, and for various reasons.

a) being outside of protection of the shutter will mean that it is constantly in contact with the air and dust. This will mean it will require more constant cleaning than a sensor would. How often do you clean the mirror inside your SLR? Hardly ever because you know it won't show up on photos. How often are you going to clean this extra piece of glass?

b) The placement of being between the lens and the sensor will mean that any dust on the glass would be spread over a larger area of the sensor, degrading quality. We probably all know what an example of dust on the 'sensor' looks like. That dust is on the protective glass right in front of the sensor, so only really covers the few pixels directly under. Being on glass in front of this would cause a larger smudge to be affected by the dust.

c) CA, diffraction, and all of those other nasty things. You have just had the light of your subject travelling through an expensive lens filled with precision glass. That nice white L lens you bought has scored amazingly well on sharpness and contrast tests. Now, however all that precision engineered light is passing at a steep angle through a cheap piece of glass placed in front of your sensor. Unless they spend a lot of money developing some very good quality coated glass, it is unlikely that it will not effect the quality of your photo. And depending on what lens you have, and the angles of incidence that the light from it is hitting this glass, will likely change how the glass effects it. To make none of this happen, you would need multi-element glass, or effectively another lens inside the camera, which would increase cost and give you even more to need to maintain and clean.

Also, in the placement where you put the glass, it might not fit with all lenses. I know some rear lens elements protrude more into the body with others, and I don't have any measurements, but at a guess some have been designed to only just narrowly miss the mirror as it flips up. Putting this glass in the way would mean these lenses no longer fit those cameras.

To summarise, it's not practical, and would degrade image quality. The sensor already has filtered glass on it that can be cleaned, and that is protected by a shutter that opens when it needs to to minimise contact with the air. Introducing an extra glass element removes this simplicity and makes the whole process of keeping things clean more difficult.

Correct answer by Dreamager on November 20, 2020

Sigma DSLRs have this feature instead of dust-reduction which almost all others have. In the case of these Sigma DSLR, this also block IR light from reaching the sensor while other DSLRs have a filter right in front of it to do that.

The suggestion of @rfusca is one I thought of before. It would probably not be complicated to have a protective cover in place which gets opened up when a lens is mounted. It would be hard to make such a moving part completely sealed, so the sensor clean function would need to open it too (in addition to lift me mirror).

Remember though that if your camera and lens are not both sealed, particles can still enter the camera. Leaving an optical grade class there could help but it would probably add unwanted internal reflections when bright light are in the scene.

Answered by Itai on November 20, 2020

The problem with having a glass screen over the lens mount is that it would be useless as the if the rest of the interior cavity is not sealed from dust. The protective screen would then prevent you from cleaning out dust that got in from other sources.

Camera bodies are not assembled in a clean room environment, so there is dust around the sensor from day one. I've had dust problems with fixed lens bridge cameras which are much worse because you can't get to the sensor to clean it.

A removable filter is one option, but it adds to the cost, and isn't a 100% solution in any case. Regular sensor cleaning is, I'm afraid the best option currently.

Answered by Matt Grum on November 20, 2020

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP