Photography Asked on May 19, 2021
Exif timestamps have a format of "YYYY:MM:DD HH:MM:SS", possibly with a timezone at the end.
Is there a general convention for how to handle these timestamps when the known precision is less than to the second?
For instance, for scans of my parent’s wedding photos the timestamps should be only "YYYY:MM:DD" without any time of day (since I’ve no idea what time it was), but that format isn’t allowed.
I have a vacation photo that I know was taken in August 1963, but again, "1963:08" isn’t considered valid.
I can’t be the only one that has scanned old photos and run into this inability to specify precision.
There are obviously many ways around it, such as using one of the description fields and ignoring the date tag, or putting the date in the filename, or … .
I’m wondering if people that frequently work with scanned photos have come up with a standard convention for handling the problem.
Assuming your scanned images have EXIF headers, you can use jhead.exe
to change time stamp meta data. Jhead is a console (command line) program.
You would be interested in the following options:
-ds change date stamp YYYY:MM:DD (ignore YYYY:MM and YYYY options)
-ts change date-time stamp yyyy:mm:dd-hh:mm:ss
-ft change file time to EXIF time (handy if you sort images by date-time)
Examples:
jhead -ds1975:04:17 pic.jpg
(Note, there is no space between the command & date)
Jhead -ts1975:04:17-00:00:00 pic.jpg
I would use the -ts
option and set the time to 00:00:00
.
If your image file doesn't have an EXIF header, then you can copy the EXIF data from another image with jhead.
Jhead is best used in a batch script. It is compiled for Windows, OS X, and Unix/Linux operating systems. Jhead can be downloaded from: https://www.sentex.ca/~mwandel/jhead/index.html
If you really want to have excellent control over manipulating EXIF data, exiftool
is the program of choice. It is a console program and very complicated to use. Again, best used in batch scripts. There are GUI front ends for exiftool
which makes life easier.
Answered by qrk on May 19, 2021
Technically according to the EXIF specs, you would use spaces in places where the number isn't known. So August 1963 would be "1963:08: : : "
. But not all programs might be able to read, much less write data like this.
Exiftool can write EXIF data like this but requires the use of the -n
(--printConv
) option. For example
exiftool -EXIF:DateTimeOriginal="1963:08: : : " -n file.jpg
or using the hashtag version of -n
exiftool -EXIF:DateTimeOriginal#="1963:08: : : " file.jpg
XMP timestamps, on the other hand, allow partial dates. With exiftool this would be acceptable
exiftool -XMP:CreateDate=1963:08 file.jpg
The workaround that a lot of people use is to set the unknown values to the first moment after the known date/time. In your example, many people would use "1963:08:01 00:00:00"
Answered by StarGeek on May 19, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP