Photography Asked on July 30, 2021
With Apple’s recent rollout of their new iMac line, I have been considering upgrading my 2011 computer to something more modern.
However, I know that my scanner, Epson V500, doesn’t work with macOS Big Sur as of May 2021* (I have tried on another computer running Big Sur) – and what good would a new computer be if I can’t scan pictures with it?
So upgrading computers would also mean having to purchase a new scanner.
I have been looking for articles comparing currently available scanners that would be able to scan the formats I shoot – 110, 16mm, 35mm half-frame, 35mm, 120, and 6×10, and have been struggling to find a review that wasn’t mostly oriented towards 35mm film scanning or very expensive professional gear.
What are good, consumer-level film scanners that are Big Sur compatible and can scan a variety of formats?
*: The only macOS app I found for Big Sur on the Epson website is called "Easy Photo Scan" (I use "Epson Scan" on High Sierra). "Easy Photo Scan" couldn’t connect to the scanner and I also got the "Cannot find a driver" error message and a "Couldn’t communicate with helper application".
Since I don’t own a scanner and don’t run a Mac, this is a little out of left field...why not just keep the old computer and scanner as dedicated hardware for scanning film?
It works now. It will continue to work if you buy another computer. It’s not terribly hard to network a couple of computers together so files can be shared.
The analogy I would use is to a darkroom. A darkroom has dedicated equipment. If you buy a new enlarger, you can still keep the old one. You don’t have to replace the sink either.
In the worst case it doesn’t work for your needs and six months from now you buy another scanner and repurpose the old Mac. Or maybe it all works out fine because it isn’t broken.
Answered by Bob Macaroni McStevens on July 30, 2021
Just so this isn't an 'answer in a comment'
Before you give up, try VueScan - specifically reverse-engineered older drivers to run on Big Sur. I haven't used it myself, but a lot of people have been talking about it this past year - https://www.hamrick.com
Answered by Tetsujin on July 30, 2021
Sorry, not an answer to the exact question, but it is a possible workaround to keep using your old scanner, software and reduce you impact on the environment as no new scanner is bought.
Mac's can boot from an external harddrive.
By following these (rough) steps you can create an environment where you can keep using your old scanner:
I've used this in your exact scenario a few years back when my film scanner was only supported until Snow Leopard (10.6), and I upgraded my Mac to Mountain Lion (10.8)
Answered by Saaru Lindestøkke on July 30, 2021
Taking the lead @Tetsujin and not leaving my comment as an answer
According to Epson the V500 is supported under macOS 11.x
And the commercial scanning software package Silverfast supports both the V500 and maxOS 11.0 (but I don't know if that means 11.0 or 11.x)
So that is a theoretical set of drivers and scanning software that is supported under Big Sur. I haven't tried this combination myself, but if I was shooting a lot more film than I am now, I was considering a V850 and Silverfast combination.
Now regarding the M1 based Macs, I wouldn't be going there just yet as I wouldn't trust the driver software to be compatible with those new chips. OTOH I would recommend them as a general purpose computer. However note that the iMac (no matter how sweet it looks) has a $$$ premium over the equivalent Mac mini
Answered by Peter M on July 30, 2021
Slight change of gears here, but my desk sits firmly in the center of a rather large filing area full of 4x5 and 120mm transparencies and older photographic prints (primarily B&W) of antique paintings.
When the older prosumer scanner I used for book publishing lost OS support, I switched to using a light box with the slide-holder template from that scanner for transparencies: I use my camera with macro on a tripod, zoomed to full-frame. The results are frankly superior to the flatbed(s) I had been using, and is very much faster when batch scanning.
I also use the camera and studio lights for the 8x10 prints.
35mm is harder, but if you can fill the frame, its worth a try.
I shoot them in RAW, and any software that handles negatives can handle your output.
Note the lightbox was made for color-proofing etc., so it has consistent diffusion and color temp.
No Newton ring problems on scans either.
Answered by Yorik on July 30, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP