TransWikia.com

I want to photograph in low light settings and make 11x15 enlargements, current smartphone not adequate

Photography Asked on March 27, 2021

I have $350 US dollars to spend and was looking at new smartphones with top criteria being picture quality (have newborn, need pics).

However, I read even sub $200 cameras have better performance than phones costing $600. Plus, as a dedicated appliance, longevity seems better as well.

Are there small form factor(but good sensor size) cameras under $350 that can best say iPhone SE or Google Pixal 4a?
Criteria:

  1. Low light performance
  2. "Speed performance"/anti-blur
  3. 11×15 enlargements
  4. Optical zoom

In optimal light conditions, and optimal settings (little one standing still), current smartphone adequate.

If so, I will likely purchase cheap smartphone ($99) and upto $350 camera instead.

Edit: Point and shoot cameras (say from Nikon) are viable alternative?

One Answer

Look for a second hand Nikon or Canon. With Christmas just past there will be a flood of them on the market from people who got a snazzier camera from Santa.

In particular you want one with an f/1.8 f/1.6 or f/1.4 lens. This will maximize your light gathering capability. This won't have optical zoom, but most zoom lenses that come with with entry level cameras will be f/3.5 at best. This is about 1/12 the light gather capability of an f/1.4. When you can afford it there are some good f/2.8 (one stop faster) zooms.

Read reviews. You may find that an older full frame 12 megapixel camera has better lowlight performance than an newer APC beginner camera. In general larger sensor sizes will do better in low light. Newer ones also do better, so there is a trade off.

Locally I found a Nikon 3300 with a f/1.8 lens for $425 Canadian, which would be under 300 US.

Try ebay also.


A commenter pointed out the 11x15 print size, which I didn't take into account.

No phone is going to give you acceptable sharpness at 11x15 even in good light conditions.

Indeed, if this is a solid criterion, then I suggest that you try renting a full frame camera, and an f/2.8 zoom.

300 dpi is about the coarsest you can go and not have visible dots. For comparison color newsprint is about 150-180 dpi. National Geographic is something like 600. (These figures are dredged out of a very deep, but ancient box of trivia in my head. Commenters will set me straight shortly.)

300 dpi * 11 inches means that the short dimension of your image has to be 3300 pixels. 20 Mpix will manage this, but you will have to crop tightly.

Correct answer by Sherwood Botsford on March 27, 2021

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP