Photography Asked on June 13, 2021
After taking a set of photos and importing them to my computer, I like to look through and choose the best ones, as I expect most people do. The usual way to record this seems by setting a 1-5 star-rating in the photo metadata (either in file or in a separate database or sidecar file).
But while a photo might be the best of a set, it still might not be one that I think is particularly good or interesting compared to other photos I’ve taken – e.g. perhaps the entire set is of a subject that’s not all that interesting to me.
The star rating seems to be treated as relative to all my other photos – e.g. in Digikam there is a prominent option to see all photos that have ever been given any particular star rating.
Are there good ways to record the rating of a photo relative to other photos in the set? This would seem useful when I don’t particularly want to make a given photo highly prominent to myself, but I want to ensure that next time I look at that set of images I will immediately be able to find the ones I thought were the best of them.
You mean other than "be more sparing in your assessments"?
I only ever flag session images with one or two stars. Most images are either culled or receive no stars.
Nothing ever gets a 4 or 5 until it is published & either earns good money or is well-received publicly [depending on publish method]
This method allows a 3-star to be 'hot' but not published.
As my sessions are store by date + session name, that allows me to quickly filter any session by star rating, but I have no method that can filter globally.
Answered by Tetsujin on June 13, 2021
About 95% of my work is done on contract for the clients (they pay for the exclusive, unlimited rights to the images), so I don't have a concept of cross shoot comparison in my workflow. Speed is also essential, so I use a multi-pass method to cull my images:
This is a very quick assessment, 1-2 seconds per image where I throw away any pictures that have technical issues, I have an immediate negative reaction to or just don't "speak."
The images that are left get flagged and marked with 3 stars. Usually leaving about 20% of the photos remaining.
This is a longer assessment, 3-5 seconds per image. Asking if compared to my current average work, is this image better or worse than average.
The images that are about average stay 3 stars, lower become a 2 star, higher become a 4 star. Leaves about 5% the original images at 4 stars.
This is the longest assessment, 5-10 seconds per image. Asking if there is anything genuinely special about the image.
The images that make the cut are increased to 5 stars. Leaves about 1% the original images at 5 stars.
Finally, I make proofs and show the 4 and 5 star images to the client. For situations where I make my money off print sales, I will include 3 star images that might be special to the client even if they only represent my average work. (Images of the "grandmother pinning the broach she wore at her wedding on the bride as her something borrowed" sort of thing.)
I use color ratings to determine the reaction of the client.
Red: The client didn't like the image. (Rare after 24 years of working with clients and learning what different types of clients like.) Yellow: The client had a neutral reaction. Green: The client had a positive visual reaction. Blue: The client commented positively on the image. Purple: The client got excited about the image.
I use one of those little 5 color highlighters to mark the backs of the prints based on their reaction and transfer those ratings into Lightroom when I get back to the office.
Using this method, I can sort and rate 500 images from a 12 hour fashion shoot in about half an hour, and the 1200-1400 shots from a wedding in about an hour and twenty.
Answered by LightBender on June 13, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP