How does the lender benefit from offering a Reverse Mortgage?

They just let you borrow a little more every months. When the owner dies/sells they get all their money + % back.

Banks don't want to manage property. They despise the fact that they have all of these foreclosures that they can't sell. They just want to loan you the money at X% and collect the fees and interest.

The value of a reverse mortgage to the lender is that it's a collateralized loan against a property. When the owner exits the property, it's attached to the property and must be paid back before the property is sold. They carefully consider the age of the recipient, equity in the property, etc. when they decide how much to pay the owner so that the chances of the loan going underwater are minimized.

In the United States, most reverse mortgages:

• Have much higher interest rates than regular mortgages.
• Are variable rate loans, so the lender has little interest rate risk.
• Have lower loan-to-value ratios than regular mortgages.
• Have government guarantees, so the lender has limited capital risk.
• Force the owners to sell (or pay off the mortgage another way) once the owners are no longer able to live in the home.

The lender makes money on the interest just like any other home loan. The HECM reverse mortgage is basically a home loan, but it’s designed to give seniors access their homes equity without taking on a mortgage payment or giving up ownership of the home. Their obligation is to continue paying their property taxes, homeowners insurance, HOA dues, etc. As long as they do that, no payments are required. They leave the home to their heirs and the heirs can inherit any equity remaining in the home.

If you did a calculation of the appreciation of your home value from the date of a reverse mortgage to 20 years in the future you might find that the opportunity for banks to make a bundle is evident. An argument can be made that banks stand to make tens of thousands if not 100's or thousands off a reverse mortgage. There are up front closing costs and fees which I believe are capped at $6,000. Then there is the higher than average interest rate, (presently at about 3.6%), along with other interest charges that may be assessed each month. The homeowner is still responsible for property taxes, upkeep, etc. In a nutshell, not only are banks making money of the higher interest rate of the reverse mortgage, along with thousand in assorted fees, they get the appreciated value of the home. Sounds like a huge win for banks. As my father use to say, they give you apples for orchards.