Personal Finance & Money Asked on January 5, 2021
I bought an old car two years ago for 4000$. Now I am selling it for 2000$. Meanwhile I had much repairs which exceeded all the prices. Determining the value of such an old car is hard.
Once upon a time, I put the following transaction of 4000$ into Expenses:Transportation:Car
from my bank account.
Today I put $2000 into my bank account but the question is: Where to put the other transaction?
My question is (partially) answered in: https://lists.gnucash.org/docs/C/gnucash-guide/ch08s08.html However, I have a couple of questions here:
It seems to be a hassle to create an account for everything I own … and particularly an older car will only depreciate in value. I am not sure if it is fair to call this “Asset” and to account for it as such.
But if so, … if I account for House and Car I own like this … where does it end? TV for 4000$? TV for 200$? Mobile phone? Laptop? All these things have sort of “value” but only depreciate and either I sell them at some point at a very low price or use them until they die. And for all of them, assessing the “market value” is hard and it’s a pain to keep track of it.
In the end, I always put things that I bought (including this 4000$) in Expenses
.
What is the proper way to do this? Is it just “definition” that this is done for real estate and cars but not TVs, laptops, phones, furniture?
Furthermore, in the linked tutorial the house is sold for a lower price than it was bought (as said, this will be the case for nearly everything else that’s used). Still – in the tutorial it is put as NEGATIVE value into Income:Realized Gain:House
. But that’s clearly not an income – it’s the opposite. Why?
Most people are going to list their house as an asset and some will also list their vehicles (I do). I don't go any further than that, but also have nothing of value remotely close to those two items. For the few items that I do own worth more than say $1000, I generally plan on keeping them forever (i.e. until it is effectively worthless), so it's just an expense when I buy it. If I had something else of immense value, say a rare painting worth $100K, I'd also include that.
So where to draw the line is completely up to you but two good starting points are a) Is it worth a 'considerable' amount of money? and b) Do I ever intend to sell the item and recoup some of that money? If yes, then it might be worth tracking appreciation/depreciation. Note that most items people purchase over time become worthless relatively quickly - so any time spent accounting for them will ultimately lead to significant effort trying to figure out how much your next garage sale might be worth.
If you still want to track these items, you'd do so the same way. Let's use a Cell Phone as an example, an expensive one:
Buy iPhone: Assets:Checking -> Assets:iPhone $800
Assume it depreciates every month by 10%: Month1: Assets:iPhone -> Expenses:Phone -$80 Month2: Assets:iPhone -> Expenses:Phone -$80 ... etc....
As for the mechanics of the other transfers:
When you purchase the asset (let's say your car):
Assets:Checking Account -> Assets:Car $4000
Then either yearly, monthly, weekly or whatever your tolerance for pain, you can update the value of the vehicle. Let's say you did this yearly:
Year before last: Assets:Car -> Expenses:Car Depreciation. $1000
Last year: Assets:Car -> Expenses:Car Depreciation. $1000
Now the asset accurately reflects that it is only worth $2000:
Assets:Car $2000
When you sell it: Assets:Car->Assets:Checking $2000
And the Assets:Car account will have nothing in it as it should.
The process is the same even if you take out a loan for the vehicle, but the initial transfer comes from Liabilities:Car Loan.
Correct answer by Andy on January 5, 2021
Depreciation is the answer.
The "proper" way is that, yes, each item you buy depreciates over time. How long for and how fast depends on the item: A phone may depreciate 60% in the first year and 40% in the second, while a house may depreciate 2% a year for 50 years.
In practice, items under some amount are considered expenses rather than assets. For my tax authority (New Zealand) that amount is $500. Before I knew that, I was claiming depreciation on everything used in the business. It is, as you point out, a hassle. You are not claiming a tax reduction based on these numbers, so you can use whatever number you like, or simply arbitrarily decide for each item whether the residual value after depreciation is ever likely to matter (i.e. whether or not you think you'll sell it).
Another, much simpler, option is to depreciate everything 100% the instant you buy it, and treat any money you get from selling your used stuff as uncategorised income.
Answered by Rupert Morrish on January 5, 2021
Adding a new answer because this is too much information for a comment..
Your example blurs the lines unnecessarily- "Depreciate a $4000 car, why not a $2000 laptop?". Most cars cost well over $4K, especially newer cars. Instead of focusing on the value of the item, I suggest you shift your perspective and think of a different dividing line based on the likelihood of reselling the item (with predictable price fluctuations). In this context a house, car, boat, and collectibles... all are likely to be resold. Laptop, phone, TV... are less likely.
To give an example of lower-price item which is very likely to be resold, think about stocks. You buy an item:
Assets:Checking -> Assets:Investment:Stock
then after some time the price has fluctuated and you sell the stock. If the stock has gained or lost value, you need to account for that change in value. The general rule to use when accounting for appreciation and depreciation is this: Both sides of the asset account (credits and debits) need to balance out before the account can be closed. Thus, if you purchase an asset for $1000 and sell it for $1200, there is a $200 imbalance in that account. You can correct this by transferring
$200 from Income:Capital Gains -> Assets:Investment:Stock
and the account will be balanced. Likewise, if you buy for $1000 but only sell for $700, you can create a negative transaction:
$300 from Assets:Investment:Stock -> Income:Capital Gains
and the stock account will be balanced (you might want to add a memo "Capital Loss" so that later you know this was intentional). Using this paradigm helps to keep track of taxable events, totaled over the course of a calendar year; but the same ideas transfer very nicely over to selling other physical assets which have similarly gained or lost value.
To summarize, accounts representing a physical asset do not retain any value, so any difference between the purchase and sale price get accounted for with transfers from an Income:Capital Gains account (whether it's a gain or a loss on the transaction).
Answered by Derek_6424246 on January 5, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP