Personal Finance & Money Asked on December 24, 2020
I understand the bonds don’t entail ownership of a company/country — they just a pay a coupon at a later date.
However, I want to verify the financial correctness of the term:
Institutional ownership of bonds has increased since May.
To me, it makes sense, because a financial institution can own a security — be it an equity or fixed income security. I didn’t coin the phrase; I saw it on WSJ or Bloomberg or somewhere. I don’t remember exactly which articles used the term, but I recall it being used once or twice. However, it’s far less common than say "allocations."
To me it makes sense, but is "institutional ownership of bonds" an easily understandable collocation to the broader financial community?
Yes. "institutional ownership" just means bonds (or stocks) that are owned by banks, investment firms, pension funds, endowments, etc. As opposed to "retail ownership" by individuals, which is more common for stocks.
So "Institutional ownership of bonds has increased since May." Means that these institutions own more bonds (or perhaps a higher proportion of bonds, depending on the context) that they did before May.
Correct answer by D Stanley on December 24, 2020
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP