TransWikia.com

Open affine subscheme of affine scheme which is not principal

MathOverflow Asked by Wanderer on February 28, 2021

I’m not sure whether this is non-trivial or not, but do there exist simple examples of an affine scheme $X$ having an open affine subscheme $U$ which is not principal in $X$? By a principal open of $X = mathrm{Spec} A$, I mean anything of the form $D(f) = {mathfrak p in mathrm{Spec} A : f notin mathfrak p}$, where $f$ is an element of $A$.

5 Answers

Let X be an elliptic curve with the identity element O removed. Let U=X-P where P is a point of infinite order. Then U is affine by a Riemann-Roch argument. Now suppose that U=D(f). Then on the entire elliptic curve, the divisor of f must be supported at P and O only. This implies that P is a torsion point, a contradiction.

Correct answer by Peter McNamara on February 28, 2021

Here is arguably the easiest example (morally of course the same as Peter McNamara's): The cuspidal affine cubic.

Let $k$ be a field of characteristic zero and let $A=k[x,y]/(y^2-x^3)$, $X=operatorname{Spec}A$, and $U=Xsetminus {(1,1)}$.

$U$ is not a distinguished open: We have the isomorphism $Asimeq k[t^2,t^3] subset k[t]$ given by $xmapsto t^2, ymapsto t^3$. So suppose there is a polynomial $f(x,y)$ representing a function in $A$ that vanishes only at $(1,1)$. Then $f(t^2,t^3)$ is a polynomial in $t$ that vanishes only at $t=1$. Therefore we have an equality, $f(t^2,t^3)= C(t-1)^N$, for some $0neq Cin k$ and some $N>0$. This is absurd, as one sees by considering the $t$-coefficient.

$U$ is in fact affine: This follows either from Hartshorne II, 2.17 b), by considering the open subsets $Ucap D(x-1)$ and $Ucap D(y-1)$, or one can proceed as follows: By geometric intuition, one may expect the coordinate ring of $U$ to be the subring $B$ of $k(t)$ consisting of those elements $f$ satisfying $f'(0)=0$ and $f$ has no poles outside of $t=1$. Then it remains to show that $operatorname{Spec} Ato operatorname{Spec} B$ is an isomorphism onto $U$. One can check directly that the image is $U$, and we get isomorphisms after localizing at $t^2-1$ and $t^3-1$ respectively, which shows the claim.

Remarks: Instead of $(1,1)$ one can of course take any point on $X$ away from the origin. A similar argument works for the nodal cubic as long as one takes a point that doesn't correspond to a root of unity in the group law. That way one also gets an easy example in positive characteristic (although not over a finite field...).

Answered by Nikolas Kuhn on February 28, 2021

I just want to remark that there is a purely categorical characterization of the ideals $I subseteq A$ such that the corresponding open subscheme $D(I) = V(I)^c$ of $text{Spec}(A)$ is affine, namely that the ideal $I$ is codisjunctable. This means that there is a universal homomorphism $A to B$ satisfying $IB=B$. This notion is studied in

Yves Diers, Codisjunctors and Singular Epimorphisms in the Category of Commutative Rings, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 53, 1988, pp. 39 - 57

Answered by Martin Brandenburg on February 28, 2021

For a simple, really concrete example you can also look at:

$A=k[x,y,u,v]/(xy+ux^2+vy^2)$, $X =Spec(A)$, $I=(x,y)$, $U = D(I)$.

Then the functions $f=frac{-v}{x}=frac{y+ux}{y^2}$ and $g=frac{-u}{y}=frac{x+vy}{x^2}$ are defined on $U$. But $yf+xg=1$, so $U$ is affine!

Cheers,

Answered by Hailong Dao on February 28, 2021

I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but if you mean whose complement isn't principal, take $mathbb{A}^2setminus{0}$ which is an open subscheme of $mathbb{A}^2$. Now, if you mean that the open subscheme isn't cut out by a single equation, any open subscheme other than the whole space will do for an irreducible scheme, because the only open set which is cut out by an ideal is the whole scheme.

Answered by Charles Siegel on February 28, 2021

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP