MathOverflow Asked by Vidit Nanda on February 21, 2021
Quillen’s Theorem A says that a functor $F:C to D$ (between 1-categories) induces a homotopy equivalence of classifying spaces $BC simeq BD$ if for every object $d$ in $D$ the fiber category $F/d$ has a contractible classifying space.
Quick reminder: the objects of $F/d$ are pairs $(c,gamma)$ consisting of an object $c$ in $C$ and a morphism $gamma:Fc to d$ in $D$; and morphisms $(c,gamma) to (c’,gamma’)$ in $F/d$ are given by all $f:c to c’$ in $C$ satisfying $gamma = gamma’ circ Ff$ in $D$.
Here are two natural extensions of this result:
My question is, is the union of 1 and 2 published somewhere? Which is to say, if I have a (lax/oplax) functor $F:C to D$ between $2$-categories which is equivariant with respect to the action of some group $Gamma$, and if its fiber 2-categories are $Gamma$-equivariantly contractible, can I automatically claim that $F$ induces a $Gamma$-equivariant homotopy equivalence between classifying spaces?
What I’m hoping to avoid is the scenario where the result is decipherable "only from the corresponding result for sheaves on $(infty,1)$-topoi" or something similar. For reasons both psychological and mathematical, I’d like to restrict the categorical depth to $leq 2$ if at all possible.
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP