Example of an intersection complex not concentrated in a single degree

I’m having trouble finding references for in-depth examples of perverse sheaves, so answers in the form of such a reference would be most helpful.

I want to construct an example of an intersection complex not concentrated in a single (natural) cohomology degree. Reading BBD, it seems the definition of intermediate extension needs to be made in the derived category, even to discuss intermediate extension of constant sheaves. So I think I can find an example of an open inclusion $j: U_0 hookrightarrow X_0$ such that $j_{!*} bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell} [d]$ is not concentrated in degree $d$. I’m looking for a simplest example, but I’m having trouble verifying my work so far. So I would also appreciate if someone could point out any glaring errors in my reasoning (and lack thereof).

The first few attempts I made all seem to have $R^1 j_! bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell} = 0$, and so $Rj_! bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell} [d] = {}^p j_!bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell}[d]$; so ${}^pj_! bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell} [d] hookrightarrow {}^p j_* bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell} [d]$; hence $j_{!*} (bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell} [d]) = j_!(bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell}) [d]$.

In particular, the above seems that to hold whenever $X_0$ is smooth and $j: U_0 hookrightarrow X_0$ is the inclusion of dense open. So this is not the right direction.

Looking now at singular varieties, the first two examples that come to mind are $C_0 = mathrm{Proj} (mathbb{F}_q[S,T,U]/(T^2U-S^3))$ (projective cubic curve with a cusp) and $C’_0 = mathrm{Proj} (mathbb{F}_q[S,T,U]/(T^2U – S^3 – S^2U))$ (projective cubic curve with a node). Note the nonsingular loci $C_{ns, 0} cong mathbb{A}^1_0$ and $C’_{ns, 0} cong mathbb{G}_{m, 0}$. (Assume $mathrm{char}(mathbb{F}_q) > 2$ for $C’_0$.)

But in the case of $C_0$, taking $j: C_{ns,0} hookrightarrow C_0$ to be the inclusion of the nonsingular locus, it appears to me that $Rj_!$ is exact. In particular, the stalk at a geometric point ${bar{x}}$ lying over the node $x in C_0$
$$
(R^1 j_! bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell})_{bar{x}} =
lim_{to} H^1 (U, j_! bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell}) overset{(a)}{=}
lim_{to} H^1_c (U times_{C_{0}} C_{ns, 0}, bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell}) overset{(b)}{cong}
H^1_c (mathbb{A}^1, bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell}),
$$
where the limit is taken over étale $U to C_0$ over $bar{x}$. Then we have $H^1_c(mathbb{A}^1, bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell})$ vanishes by Poincaré dualtiy as $H^1 (mathbb{A}^1, bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell}) = 0$. (I think $(a)$ holds by definition of $H^*_c$, and $(b)$ I can’t justify.) So, assuming every link in this chain holds, we have $j_! = j_{!*}$, and I have not found my example.

But I believe—if my reasoning is at all accurate for $C_0$—that I have found an example in $j’: C’_{ns, 0} hookrightarrow C’_0$. Repeating the argument above, with $x’ in C’_0$ the self-intersection point,
$$
(R^1 j’_! bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell})_{bar{x}’} =
lim_{to} H^1 (U, j’_! bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell}) =
lim_{to} H^1_c (U times_{C’_0} C’_{ns, 0}, bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell}) cong
H^1_c (mathbb{G}_{m}, bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell}).
$$
In this case, we have $H^1 (mathbb{G}_{m}, bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell}) = bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell}(-1)$ (this is my understanding after reading Milne’s and de Jong’s notes on étale cohomology), and so $(R^1 j’_! bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell})_{bar{x}’} = bar{mathbb{Q}}_{ell}(1) ne 0$. Since we have determined now that $j’_!$ is not exact, we need to calculate ${}^p j’_!$, ${}^p j’_*$, and finally calculate $j’_{!*}$. Should I keep going? Am I on the right track? Have I made glaring errors? Is there a reason $(b)$ should hold? What can I read to speed up my progress on these questions? I’ve read BBD and Kiehl-Weissauer, and a couple of less formal notes on perverse sheaves, and I’ve seen precious few examples in any detail. I recognize I haven’t read the entire literature, so does anyone know where I should look next?