TransWikia.com

Proving $logleft(frac{4^n}{sqrt{2n+1}{2nchoose n+m}}right)geq frac{m^2}{n}$

Mathematics Asked by Zaragosa on November 29, 2021

I have tried doing this exercise,

Let $m,ninmathbb{N}, mleq n$, prove that
$$logleft(frac{4^n}{displaystylesqrt{2n+1}{2nchoose n+m}}right)geq frac{m^2}{n}$$

I achieved some results like for example,
$$displaystylesum_{i=0}^n 2^ibinom{2n-i}{n} = 4^n$$ and
$$displaystyle {{2n}choose{n}} > frac{4^n}{2n}$$ trying to find a relationship but it doesn’t work for me. Any idea?

2 Answers

With @skbmoore's work, we know that this is true for $m<sqrt{log(pi/2)}n$. I'll now show that it's also true for $m>frac12n$, which will obviously prove the result.

Rearrange the desired inequality as thus: $$logleft(frac{4^n}{sqrt{2n+1}}right)gefrac{m^2}n+logbinom{2n}{n+m}=f_n(m).$$ We're basically going to try to show that $f_n(m)$ is decreasing after $m=n/2$ (actually, it's a bit before that; I believe it is somehow related to OEIS A143978).

Observe that $$frac d{dm}f_n(m)=frac{2m}n+psi(n-m+1)-psi(n+m+1),$$ where $psi$ is the digamma function. (This is from Wolfram Alpha; I've actually never worked with $psi$ before today, so please let me know if I mess up anywhere here—I'm a bit out of my depth!) Do note that we're extending $f_n(m)$ to be over $[1,n]$, instead of only the integers.

Apparently, for $zne-1,-2,dots$, there is an equation for the digamma function, namely $$psi(z+1)=-gamma+sum_{k=1}^inftyleft(frac1k-frac1{k+z}right),$$ where $gamma$ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. It is fortunate for us, then, that $n-m$ and $n+m$ are never nonnegative integers! This means, in particular, that $$-g_n(m)=psi(n-m+1)-psi(n+m+1)=sum_{k=1}^inftyleft(frac1{k+n+m}-frac1{k+n-m}right).$$

Our goal, then, is going to be to show that $g_n(m)>frac{2m}n$ for all $n>m>frac n2$. Then we can show that $f_n(m)=frac{2m}n-g_n(m)<0$.

First, observe that $$frac d{dm}g_n(m)=sum_{k=1}^inftyleft(frac1{(k+n+m)^2}-frac1{(k+n-m)^2}right)>0$$ for all $m$. This means, in particular, that if $m$ is not an integer, then $g_n(m)$ is sandwiched between $g_n(lfloor mrfloor)$ and $g_n(lceil mrceil)$. Obviously, the function $frac{2m}n$ is increasing with respect to $m$. This all implies that it is sufficient to show that $$tag{*}g_n(m)gefrac{2m-2}n$$ for integers $mgefrac n2$.

However, for integers $m$, we know that $g_n(m)$ telescopes as $$g_n(m)=sum_{k=1}^{2m}frac1{k+n-m}.$$ Now, if $(*)$ holds for $m$, then it holds for $m+1$. This can be seen by observing that the left hand side increases by $frac1{n-m}+frac1{n+m+1}$, while the right side increases by $frac2n$.

Thus it suffices to prove the statement $(*)$ for $m=lceilfrac n2rceil$. But then begin{align*}g_n(m)&gesum_{k=1}^nfrac1{k+(n-1)/2}\frac{2(m-1)}n&le1.end{align*} So it suffices to prove that $h(n)=sum_{k=1}^nfrac1{k+(n-1)/2}ge1$.

But it is easy to see that if we define $h(n)$ to be the sum above, but removing the floors, then $frac d{dn}h(n)<0$. Moreover, as $ntoinfty$, this approaches $log3>1$, according to Wolfram. If someone wants to give me a tip as to how to actually show this limit, I'd love to hear it, but, honestly, I'm a bit pooped! (Check out @skbmoore's explanation for why $h(n)tolog3$ in the comments!)

This does, however, prove the conjecture! I'm sure there's a much simpler way to do this, since there's no real intuition here; it's just bashing with the one tool I know how to use (Wolfram Alpha! :D)

Answered by boink on November 29, 2021

Here is a partial proof. I have some ideas, but it will be a while before I can return to it. I'll show that the conjecture is true for $m<sqrt{log{(pi/2)}} n sim .672 n.$ Maybe someone else can use these ideas for a full proof.

Use the fact that the central binomial $binom{2n}{n+m}$ has its max at $m=0.$ Do an asymptotic expansion

$$ binom{2n}{n+m} big/binom{2n}{n}=1-frac{m^2}{n}+frac{m^2(1+m^2)}{2n^2}-frac{m^2(1+4m^2+m^4)}{6n^3}... $$ It 'just so happens' that these are the first three terms in $$exp{big(-frac{m^2}{n}(1-frac{1}{2n}) big)} =1-frac{m^2}{n}+frac{m^2(1+m^2)}{2n^2}-frac{m^2(3m^2+m^4)}{6n^3}...$$ match. (The gaussian approximation is well known and I added the factor $(1-1/(2n))$ to match the third term.) The exponential makes a convenient bound to go in this problem (note the flip): $$ binom{2n}{n} big/binom{2n}{n+m} ge exp{big(frac{m^2}{n}(1-frac{1}{2n}) big)} $$

Then $$L:=logBig(frac{4^n}{sqrt{2n+1}binom{2n}{n+m}}Big)= logBig(frac{4^n}{sqrt{2n+1}binom{2n}{n}} binom{2n}{n} big/binom{2n}{n+m}Big)$$ $$ gelogBig(frac{4^n}{sqrt{2n+1}binom{2n}{n}} exp{big(frac{m^2}{n}(1-frac{1}{2n})}big) Big) $$ $$ geq frac{1}{2} log{big( pi n/(2n+1) big)} + frac{m^2}{n}(1-frac{1}{2n}) $$ where the Stirling approximation has been used for the central binomial. For large $n$ proposer's reduces to $$ frac{1}{2} log{big( pi /2)} > frac{m^2}{2n^2} .$$ This is indeed true for $m<sqrt{log{(pi/2)}} n.$

The problem that I see with this method is that the Gaussian approximation, even with my correction to get the third order term matched, does not do a good job in the 'wings' (large $m.$) A better function is needed, and I believe there are 'entropy' function formulations that can do this. I don't know if an analytic solution will be available using it, but at least the one I've given gets part of the way there.

Answered by skbmoore on November 29, 2021

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP