Geographic Information Systems Asked on February 18, 2021
I work in public health and I will be displaying positive infection cluster data to the public.
For the safety of the public and those infected, I want to somehow conceal their precise location.
I have thought of a couple possibilities.
Is there some way I can distort the streets’ shapes in my shapefile?
Is there a basemap that’s entirely vague? Pro does not have one vague enough for what I need.
How can I move the basemap so that it isn’t representing my actual points’ locations?
Any other techniques or practices?
Group your data geographically, mapping total positive cases by ZIP code, county, state, province, or whatever area. Start with a small unit of area (maybe a city block) and if you think that's too specific, move up to a bigger unit like a ZIP code until you're comfortable with the level of anonymity.
Depending on where you live, HIPAA or another law like it may have something to say on how much anonymization your data needs to go through before it can be released.
Answered by Dan C on February 18, 2021
I agree with @Dan C. Adding ambiguity via some form of aggregation to your point data is a much better strategy than trying to modify the basemap or other reference layers.
To count points within your administrative boundary of choice, use the Summarize Within tool, using the administrative boundaries as the Input Polygons and your point data as the Input Summary Feature.
You could also try using some form of density calculation to add ambiguity to the data and display clusters with tools like Kernel Density or Calculate Density. The latter may be particularly useful in your case, as you can choose an arbitrary bin shape (square or hexagon) and size to use.
Answered by lambertj on February 18, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP