English Language & Usage Asked on January 7, 2021
In Russian we have the word сорока (magpie) for a person that (among other negative traits) likes and is attracted to shiny things (e.g. gold), usually cheap ones like fake jewelry, or just kind of hoards cheap things in general.
What is the closest equivalent to this in English (preferably American English), if there is one of course?
Perhaps surprisingly, the answer is in your own question: "сорока" = magpie
magpie (countable noun): If you describe someone as a magpie, you mean that they like collecting and keeping things, often things that have little value.
{informal} "A born magpie, Mandy collects any object that catches her eye."
For example:
"Magpies do not steal trinkets and are positively scared of shiny objects, according to new research.
The study appears to refute the myth of the “thieving magpie”, which pervades European folklore.
It is widely believed that magpies have a compulsive urge to steal sparkly things for their nests."
Correct answer by Anton on January 7, 2021
Bling often implies a certain degree of cheapness in the quality of the shiny jewelry, or hubcaps, or whatever else, so a person who likes a lot of bling. Maybe a "Bling Diva" or "Bling Master" or some such combination of words would work.
Answered by J_Hat on January 7, 2021
Ostentatious comes to mind. And tacky has more negativity.
Answered by chanceoperation on January 7, 2021
@Anton's answer of magpie is probably the way to go here. But I feel compelled to throw in
positive phototaxis which is the compulsion of an organism to move towards bight objects. (Wikipedia) Like a moth to a flame.
Next time I'm feeling clever with my wife, I'll be sure to use this one.
Answered by Jim Simson on January 7, 2021
This uses a liberal amount of figurative language and pop culture, but I have heard several people use the term "niffler" to refer to someone that loves shiny things. This is a reference to the magical animal in the Harry Potter franchise that are attracted to shiny things. This would definitely be non-standard, since it is a figurative reference to something in popular culture, so this would only be useful in very informal settings with people familiar with that series.
Answered by Andrew Sansom on January 7, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP