TransWikia.com

Why "on the books", not "in the books"

English Language & Usage Asked on March 15, 2021

On the books means “part of the law”.

These changes would add little to the civil rights laws now on the
books.

I know the meaning of this idiom, and idioms are used as they are, but idioms often have stories behind. Why is it not “in the books”?
Could it be that in the old days people used slates of rocks to write on?

One Answer

My guess is that this is like "on the list" vs "in the list". You generally append new entries to an account book or ledger (more generally, you edit it). It is not like a book that is written once and for all. The same is true of laws and law books (believe it or not).

When things are added to a list, they are typically put on it (at the end), not in it. This is the same kind of action associated with a log book, an account book, etc. In many respects they are lists.

Even when, as for a law book, you can add entries in the middle or modify existing entries, the general action is updating something that is on the list. IOW, I think it is the list nature that dominates for this kind of "book".

And for on the books you are indeed checking whether something is listed, i.e., is on the list that is the book.

[Of course, a queue is appended to similarly. Yet some people (like me) say wait in line and get in line instead of wait on line and get on line.]

Correct answer by Drew on March 15, 2021

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP