English Language & Usage Asked on January 31, 2021
Which article should I use and why, both seem correct to my senses.
Here I’m talking only about a leg of mine not both.
1a) I have the leg of a footballer.
OR
1b) I have a leg of a footballer.
Here a person only can have a single body.
2a) I have the body of a supermodel.
OR
2b) I have a body of a supermodel.
Where do you keep them? Sorry, had to ask that :-)
I think in both cases it is better to use 'the'. The 'the' here does not refer to a particular limb but is used in a generic sense.
'The giraffe is the tallest of the animals'
'I can play the guitar'
Source: Raymond Murphy, English Grammar in Use, p. 150
Answered by Jules Cocovin on January 31, 2021
You're looking at a snowclone.
(where X and Y are suitable nouns/NPs, and 'he' can be a noun, 'she', 'it' or with verb adjustment 'I', 'you' or more rarely 'they').
The articles are respectively always 'the', and almost always 'a/an' though this may be replaced by the zero article if the second N/NP is plural.
'Mind' may be the original noun X, though 'body' is a close contender.
Individual body parts for X in examples showing a closer relationship are rather unusual, though expressions like
are of course common. But note that here 'inherited' rather than 'of a type / standard that is usually associated with' is the stronger semantic relation.
Used – let's say morefiguratively – this restriction is less binding:
But 'I have the leg of a footballer' sounds unusual. 'He has the legs of a fellwalker' seems perhaps more suitable. The comparator is perhaps more likely, and most people have two legs – and while using a single example ('She has a good eye for a bargain') to refer to a plurality is common, novel examples ('the finger of a pianist'; 'the leg of a footballer') don't sound natural.
Answered by Edwin Ashworth on January 31, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP