English Language & Usage Asked by Drew R on July 25, 2021
I came across the phrase in this article:
And "in this case, the law’s terms ensure that, when the federal government seeks a procedural advantage against an individual, it will at least supply him with a single and reasonably comprehensive statement of the nature of the proceedings against him. If men must turn square corners when they deal with the government," Gorsuch declared, "it cannot be too much to expect the government to turn square corners when it deals with them."
It seems to deal with matters of compunction in public service, e.g. following rules and procedures to the best of one’s ability. Another source seems to confirm this, citing a little-known "square corners doctrine." But what does it actually mean, and where does it come from?
My hypothesis is that it’s a cousin to "make sure your ‘t’s are crossed and your ‘i’s are dotted," but catchier and more efficient.
EDIT
It seems it could be the opposite of "cutting corners," though closer study of THAT phrase’s origin (whether the cater-corner or the hunting explanation) seems to indicate that this is an incomplete answer.
The blog of Bruce D. Greenberg explains the legal concept:
The “Square Corners” Doctrine
Estate of Taylor v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 422 N.J. Super. 336 (App. Div. 2011). In FMC Stores v. Borough of Morris Plains, 100 N.J. 418 (1985), the Supreme Court announced the “square corners” doctrine.
That doctrine says, in essence, that in dealing with the public, government agencies must “turn square corners,” “comport itself with compunction and integrity,” and not “conduct itself so as to achieve or preserve any kind of bargaining or litigational advantage” over a member of the public. As the Court observed, this means that “government may have to forego the freedom of action that private citizens may employ in dealing with one another.”
Answered by Greybeard on July 25, 2021
It is a direct reference to a Supreme Court precedent written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes that acknowledged that people must engage with the government on the government's terms. Holmes is famous for writing that is easy to understand by laypeople -- the idiom "to shout fire in a crowded theater" is also originated by him. Gorsuch is binding the federal bureaucracy to the same standard of formalism to which all other Americans have previously been bound.
Men must turn square corners when they deal with the Government. If it attaches even purely formal conditions to its consent to be sued those conditions must be complied with.
From Rock Island C.R.R. v. United States, 254 U.S. 141, 143 (22 November 1920)
Answered by user662852 on July 25, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP