English Language & Usage Asked on September 28, 2021
Its
most frequent use is as the participle smitten, ‘infatuated,
fascinated’. When the object of the fascination is a person, with is much more
often used than by; when the object is inanimate, the pattern is the
opposite.
What are the reasons for such choice?
OED: https://oed.com/oed2/00228565 AND https://oed.com/oed2/00228536
It is not a choice, it is usage. According to Google Books, especially from the ‘80s.
This site suggests the following nuances between “smitten with” vs “smitten by:”
Both smitten by and smitten with appear to be acceptable. Smitten with may be slightly more common, but not by much. If you feel the need to make a distinction, being smitten by someone could imply some sort of action on the part of the adored person; being smitten with someone could imply that he or she is unaware of your affection and has done nothing to encourage it—but those aren't hard-and-fast rules.
(quickanddirtytips.com)
Answered by user 66974 on September 28, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP