English Language & Usage Asked on October 5, 2021
Whether motivated by outright prejudice or simple discriminatory disinterest, …
This sentence-piece is taken from a text written on the illegalization of cannabis, stating that Mexican immigration was the reason cannabis was illegalized in the United States.
Given how discriminatory disinterest is being contrasted to outright prejudice, it would seem that discriminatory disinterest is a kind of discrimination not driven by emotional imperatives (like xenophobia, ideology, racism, etc.), but rather other motivations that simply happen to involve racial discrimination (if e.g. discriminating against Mexicans would somehow be economically favorable).
However, I don’t quite see how discriminatory disinterest means that. Does the disinterest perhaps refer to the lack of actual interest in the actual race/ethnicity at hand?
Here’s a link to the text it was taken from. You can find the sentence in the first paragraph of chapter 1: Rationale in the West: Class Legislation
The way I read it is "outright prejudice" is active in this case "the legislature actively designing legislation to harm Mexicans"
Discriminatory disinterest is still prejudice but it is passive "the legislature simply not caring, taking no effort to prevent legislation from being harmful to Mexicans"
A legislator drafted a piece of legislation that was deliberately harmful to Mexicans (outright prejudice), and the other legislators who probably knew this did nothing to prevent it from becoming law despite that being within their power or responsibility (discriminatory disinterest)
The distinction being drawn is between active and passive prejudice.
Correct answer by bob on October 5, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP