English Language & Usage Asked on June 1, 2021
Is it correct to say:
The factor that prevents data from altering is not ‘X’, but ‘Y’ and
‘Z’.
Or as alternative:
The factor that prevents data from altering is not ‘X’, but rather ‘Y’ and
‘Z’.
The purpose is to say that they are ‘Y’ and ‘Z’ which can prevent data from altering, and not ‘X’.
Note: 'X', 'Y' and 'Z' can be replaced by any word (as a factor).
You are asking about how to express a logical relationship in a way that is unambiguously clear. You are right that there is a kind of clash between the singular noun and the two (and so plural) noun complements.
I would say myself that in the original sentence there is a presumption in favour your intended meaning: "is not 'X' but '(X and Z)'.
But that presumption does not remove the dissonance or the possibility of misunderstanding.
In the expression there is or ought to be a rule that where we are dealing with legal, scientific, technical or logical matters, precision trumps brevity and elegance. So say exactly what you mean. I do not think the single quotes will do that job.
So I would suggest that you have to say "Y and Z together", or "Y together with Z"; or, perhaps better still, "a <or 'the'> combination of Y and Z".
The factor that prevents data from altering is not 'X' but the combination of 'Y' and 'Z'.
Correct answer by Tuffy on June 1, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP